Seeing Jesus
Here is a very small list of
Scriptures, pastors, theologians and academics who uphold the Second
Commandment, and deny that Christ can be seen in pictures. There are
many more of each, but this should be a good cross-section for the
reader to deal with.
Seeing
Jesus, the Misplaced Faith of Idolaters, and -
What some orthodox Councils, Confessions, Ministers and Theologians Have
said About the Second Commandment in Relation to humanity and person of
Jesus Christ
Compiled by Dr. C. Matthew McMahon
There
is no such thing as an innocent religious image
– John Calvin, (2.8.17)
Take
heed of all occasions of idolatry, for idolatry is devil worship
– Thomas Watson (TC, p. 63)
Deut
4:15, “Take ye therefore good heed
unto yourselves, (for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that the
Lord spake unto you in Horeb, out of the midst of the fire), lest you
corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image…”
The
Scriptures:
John
12:20-21, “Now there were certain Greeks among those who came up to
worship at the feast. Then they came to Philip, who was from Bethsaida
of Galilee, and asked him, saying, "Sir, we wish to see Jesus…But
Jesus answered them, saying, "The hour has come that the Son of Man
should be glorified.” (Jesus
did not show him “himself” but preached his death when they wanted
to “see him.”)
Exodus
20:4-6, “" You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any
likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is
in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the
earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them. For I, the LORD
your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers
on the children to the third and fourth generations of those who
hate Me, but showing mercy to thousands, to those who love Me and keep
My commandments.” (cf. Deut. 5:8-10)
Lev.
26:1, “You shall not make idols for yourselves; neither a carved image
nor a sacred pillar shall you rear up for yourselves; nor shall
you set up an engraved stone in your land, to bow down to it; for I am
the LORD your God.”
Psalm
115:1-8, “Not unto us, O LORD, not unto us, But to Your name give
glory, Because of Your mercy, Because of Your truth. Why should the
Gentiles say, "So where is their God?" But our God is
in heaven; He does whatever He pleases. Their idols are silver
and gold, The work of men's hands. They have mouths, but they do not
speak; Eyes they have, but they do not see; They have ears, but they do
not hear; Noses they have, but they do not smell; They have hands, but
they do not handle; Feet they have, but they do not walk; Nor do they
mutter through their throat. Those who make them are like them; So is
everyone who trusts in them.”
Isaiah
2:8, “Their land is also full of idols; They worship the work of their
own hands, That which their own fingers have made.”
Isaiah
40:18-20, “To whom then will you liken God? Or what likeness will you
compare to Him? The workman molds an image, The goldsmith overspreads it
with gold, And the silversmith casts silver chains. Whoever is too
impoverished for such a contribution Chooses a tree that will
not rot; He seeks for himself a skillful workman To prepare a carved
image that will not totter.”
Isaiah
41:21-29, “Present your case," says the LORD. "Bring forth
your strong reasons," says the King of Jacob. "Let them
bring forth and show us what will happen; Let them show the former
things, what they were, That we may consider them, And know the
latter end of them; Or declare to us things to come. Show the things
that are to come hereafter, That we may know that you are gods;
Yes, do good or do evil, That we may be dismayed and see it together.
Indeed you are nothing, And your work is nothing; He
who chooses you is an abomination. " I have raised up
one from the north, And he shall come; From the rising of the sun he
shall call on My name; And he shall come against princes as though mortar,
As the potter treads clay. Who has declared from the beginning, that we
may know? And former times, that we may say, 'He is righteous'?
Surely there is no one who shows, Surely there is no one
who declares, Surely there is no one who hears your words. The
first time I said to Zion, 'Look, there they are!' And I will
give to Jerusalem one who brings good tidings. For I looked, and there
was no man; I looked among them, but there was no counselor,
Who, when I asked of them, could answer a word. Indeed they are all
worthless; Their works are nothing; Their molded images are wind
and confusion.”
Isaiah
46:5-7, “To whom will you liken Me, and make Me equal And
compare Me, that we should be alike? They lavish gold out of the bag,
And weigh silver on the scales; They hire a goldsmith, and he makes it a
god; They prostrate themselves, yes, they worship. They bear it on the
shoulder, they carry it And set it in its place, and it stands; From its
place it shall not move. Though one cries out to it, yet it
cannot answer Nor save him out of his trouble.”
Jeremiah
10:1-5, “Hear the word which the LORD speaks to you, O house of
Israel. Thus says the LORD: "Do not learn the way of the Gentiles;
Do not be dismayed at the signs of heaven, For the Gentiles are dismayed
at them. For the customs of the peoples are futile; For one cuts
a tree from the forest, The work of the hands of the workman, with the
ax. They decorate it with silver and gold; They fasten it with nails and
hammers So that it will not topple. They are upright, like a palm
tree, And they cannot speak; They must be carried, Because they cannot
go by themselves. Do not be afraid of them, For they cannot do
evil, Nor can they do any good."”
Hosea
13:2, “Now they sin more and more, And have made for themselves molded
images, Idols of their silver, according to their skill; All of it is
the work of craftsmen. They say of them, "Let the men who
sacrifice kiss the calves!"”
Amos
5:26-27, “You also carried Sikkuth your king And Chiun, your idols,
The star of your gods, Which you made for yourselves. Therefore I will
send you into captivity beyond Damascus," Says the LORD, whose name
is the God of hosts.”
Acts
17:24-25, 29, “God, who made the world and everything in it, since He
is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands.
"Nor is He worshiped with men's hands, as though He needed
anything, since He gives to all life, breath, and all
things…Therefore, since we are the offspring of God, we ought not to
think that the Divine Nature is like gold or silver or stone, something
shaped by art and man's devising.”
Romans
1:22-25, “Professing to be wise, they became fools, and changed the
glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man
-- and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. Therefore God
also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to
dishonor their bodies among themselves, who exchanged the truth of God
for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the
Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen”
1
John 5:21, “Little children, keep yourselves from idols. Amen.”
The
Church Fathers and Councils
Augustine
of Hippo
“Thus,
they erred, who sought Christ and his apostles not in the sacred
writings, but on painted walls.” (Augustine, The Harmony of
the Gospels, 1.10 [NPNF1, 6:83; PL 34.1049])
Council
of Elibertine
"Pictures
ought not to be in churches, nor any object of adoration or praise be
painted on the walls."
Synod
of Constantinople
(Hieria,
753 AD) condemned images of Christ. Indeed, the Synod explicitly
rejected the argument - one we often hear today - that such images
represented only the flesh of Christ. It was argued that such a
separation of the Christ's human nature from His divine nature is the
heresy of Nestorianism. Nestorianism did not deny the two natures of
Christ, but it failed to see them as a unity, constituting a single
Person. Over against Nestorianism - and pictures of Jesus - the human
nature of Christ cannot be separated and represented apart from His
divine nature. According to the Synod, the only admissible figure of
Christ's humanity is the bread and wine in the Lord's Supper. For more
details of this significant decision, see John H. Leith, Creeds of
the Churches (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1982), 54-55.
Synod
of Elvira
The
36th canon of the Synod of Elvira (in Spain between
300 and 303) prohibited images as a hindrance to the spiritual
worship of God.
Clement
of Alexandria
“It
is with a different kind of spell that art deludes you…. It leads you
to pay religious honor and worship to images and pictures.” (Clement
of Alexandria, A.D. 195).
“Ages
before, Moses expressly commanded that neither a carved, nor molten, nor
molded, nor painted likeness should be made. This was so that we would
not cling to things of sense, but pass to spiritual objects. For
familiarity with the sense of sight disparages the reverence of what is
divine” (Clement of Alexandria).
Lactantius
“The
likeness of a man appears to be necessary at that time when he is far
away. But it will become unnecessary when he is at hand. However, in the
case of God, whose spirit and influence are diffused everywhere, and can
never be absent, it is plain that an image is always unnecessary” (Lactantius
A.D. 313).
Constantinople
(A. D. 754)
The
counsel, appealing to the second commandment and other scripture
passages denouncing idolatry (Rom. 1:23, 25; John 4:24), and opinions of
the Fathers (Epiphanius, Eusebius, Gregory Nazianzen, Chrysostom, etc.),
condemned and forbade the public and private worship of sacred images on
pain of deposition and excommunication…. It denounced all religious
representations by painter or sculptor as presumptuous, pagan and
idolatrous. Those who make pictures of the Savior, who is God as well as
man in one inseparable person, either limit the incomprehensible Godhead
to the bounds of created flesh, or confound his two natures like
Eutyches, or separate them, like Nestorius, or deny his Godhead, like
Arius; and those who worship such a picture are guilty of the same
heresy and blasphemy.” Phillip Schaff, History of the Christian Church
(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987 [1910]), 4:457-458
Irenaeus
"
The Church Father Irenaeus, writing towards the end of the second
century, comments on pictures of Jesus as being a peculiarity of the
Gnostics at that time (Against Heresies 1.25.6). Bishop
Epiphanius of Salamis (c. 315-403) describes how he came across a
curtain with an image of Christ or one of the saints, hanging on the
doors of a certain church. Epiphanius tore the curtain assunder, lest an
image of man be hung up in the church, "contrary to the teaching of
the Scriptures." They
style themselves Gnostics. They also possess images, some of them
painted, and others formed from different kinds of material; while they
maintain that a likeness of Christ was made by Pilate at that time when
Jesus lived among them. They crown those images, and set them up along
with the images of the philosophers of the world; that is to say, with
the images of Pythagoras, and Plato, and Aristotle and the rest. They
also have modes of honoring these images, after the same manner of the
Gentiles." Irenaeus
– Against Heresies I.xxv.6 (ca. 182-188 AD (NB:
Irenaeus regarded the possession of images to be a Gnostic peculiarity.)
Notation:
Purpose of the Westminster Assembly in terms of the Regulative Principle
Definition
of the Regulative Principle
“The
regulative principle of worship states that the only way to worship God
is in the manner that He has commanded in the Holy Scripture; all
additions to or subtractions from this manner are forbidden. This is an
application of the view that the Bible is sufficient for all good works,
and that it is the only judge in spiritual matters, as expressed in
Chapter 1 and 31:3 of the Confession.
“That
we shall…endeavour…the reformation of religion in the kingdoms of
England and Ireland, in doctrine, worship , discipline, and
government, according to the word of God, and example of the best
reformed churches.” (Westminster
Assembly of Divines. The Confession of Faith the Larger and Shorter
Catechisms with the Scripture Proofs at Large Together with the Sum of
Saving Knowledge (N.P.: The Publications Committee of the Free
Presbyterian Church of Scotland, 1967), 358–59.)
The
Westminster Assembly Followed Calvin and Jerome Zanchi for support on
the Regulative Principle. (George Gillespie, A Dispvte against the
English-Popish Ceremonies, Obtrvded vpon the Chvrch of Scotland. Wherein
Not Only Our Owne Arguments against the Same Are Strongly Confirmed, But
Likewise the Answeres and Defense of Our Opposites, Svch As Hooker,
Mortovne, Bvrges, Sprint, Paybody, Andrewes, Saravia, Tilen, Spotswood,
Lindsey, Forbesse, &c Particularly Confuted (n.p.: n.p., 1637), pt.
3, pp. 93, 121-22. )
[One]
proof is from the second commandment’s prohibition against idols. The
Westminster Assembly’s position that the second commandment taught the
regulative principle is taught in the Westminster Larger Catechism
, questions 107–110 with their scriptural proofs. (See appendix for
text of these questions.) These questions and answers show that the
Westminster Assembly believed the second commandment taught the
regulative principle of worship. (John Allen Dilevuk, WTJ 58:2 (Fall 96) p.
245)
Westminster
Larger Catechism.
Q109:
What are the sins forbidden in the second commandment?
A109:
The sins forbidden in the second commandment are, all
devising,[1] counseling,[2] commanding,[3] using,[4] and anywise
approving, any religious worship not instituted by God himself;[5]
tolerating a false religion;[6] the making any representation of God, of
all or of any of the three persons, either inwardly in our mind, or
outwardly in any kind of image or likeness of any creature
whatsoever;[7] all worshiping of it,[8] or God in it or by it;[9] the
making of any representation of feigned deities,[10] and all worship of
them, or service belonging to them;[11] all superstitious devices,[12]
corrupting the worship of God,[13] adding to it, or taking from it,[14]
whether invented and taken up of ourselves,[15] or received by tradition
from others,[16] though under the title of antiquity,[17] custom,[18]
devotion,[19] good intent, or any other pretense whatsoever;[20]
simony;[21] sacrilege;[22] all neglect,[23] contempt,[24] hindering,[25]
and opposing the worship and ordinances which God hath appointed.[26]
1.
Num. 15:39
2.
Deut. 13:6-8
3.
Hosea 5:11; Micah 6:16
4.
I Kings 11:33; 12:33
5.
Deut. 12:30-32
6.
Deut. 13:6-12; Zech. 13:2-3; Rev. 2:2, 14-15, 20, Rev. 17:12,
16-17
7.
Deut. 4:15-19; Acts 17:29; Rom. 1:21-23, 25
8.
Dan. 3:18; Gal. 4:8
9.
Exod. 32:5
10.
Exod. 32:8
11.
I Kings 18:26, 28; Isa. 65:11
12.
Acts 17:22; Col. 2:21-23
13.
Mal. 1:7-8, 14
14.
Deut. 4:2
15.
Psa. 106:39
16.
Matt. 15:9
17.
I Peter 1:18
18.
Jer. 44:17
19.
Isa. 65:3-5; Gal. 1:13-14
20.
I Sam. 13:11-12; 15:21
21.
Acts 8:18
22.
Rom. 2:22; Mal. 3:8
23.
Exod. 4:24-26
24.
Matt. 22:5; Mal. 1:7, 13
25.
Matt. 23:13
26.
Acts 13:44-45; I Thess. 2:15-16
Westminster Shorter Catechism
Q49:
Which is the Second Commandment?
A49:
The Second Commandment is, Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven
image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is
in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth, thou
shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy
God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the
children, unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate Me; and
showing mercy unto thousands of them that love Me, and keep my
commandments.[1]
1.
Exod. 20:3-6
Q50:
What is required in the Second Commandment?
A50:
The Second Commandment requireth the receiving, observing,[1] and
keeping pure and entire, all such religious worship and ordinances as
God hath appointed in His Word.[2]
1.
Deut. 32:46; Matt. 28:20
2.
Deut. 12:32
Q51:
What is forbidden in the Second Commandment?
A51:
The Second Commandment forbiddeth the worshipping of God by images,[1]
or any other way not appointed in His Word.[2]
1.
Deut. 4:15-16
2.
Col. 2:18
Q52:
What are the reasons annexed to the Second Commandment?
A52:
The reasons annexed to the Second Commandment are, God's sovereignty
over us,[2] his propriety in us,[2] and the zeal He hath to His own
worship.[3]
1.
Psa. 95:2-3
2.
Psa. 45:11
3.
Exod. 34:14
The
Heidelberg Catechism, Lord's Day 35
Q96:
What does God require in the second Commandment?
A96:
That we in no way make any image of God,[1] nor worship Him in
any other way than He has commanded us in His Word.[2]
1.
Deut. 4:15-19; Isa. 40:18, 25; Rom. 1:22-24; Acts 17:29
2.
I Sam. 15:23; Deut. 4:23-24; 12:30-32; Matt. 15:9; John 4:24
Q97:
May we not make any image at all?
A97:
God may not and cannot be imaged in any way; as for creatures,
though they may indeed be imaged, yet God forbids the making or keeping
of any likeness of them, either to worship them or to serve God by
them.[1]
1.
Exod. 23:24-25; 34:13-14; Deut. 7:5; 12:3; 16:22; II Kings 18:4;
John 1:18
Q98:
But may not pictures be tolerated in churches as books for the
people?
A98:
No, for we should not be wiser than God, who will not have His
people taught by dumb idols,[1] but by the lively preaching of His
Word.[2]
1.
Jer. 10:8; Hab. 2:18-19
2.
II Peter 1:19; II Tim. 3:16-17; Rom. 10:17
The
Second Helvetic Confession - Chapter IV
Of
Idols or Images of God, Christ and The Saints
Images
of God. Since God as Spirit is in essence invisible and immense, he
cannot really be expressed by any art or image. For this reason we have
no fear pronouncing with Scripture that images of God are mere lies.
Therefore we reject not only the idols of the Gentiles, but also the
images of Christians. Although Christ assumed human nature, yet he did
not on that account assume it in order to provide a model for carvers
and painters. He denied that he had come to abolish the law and the
prophets (Matt. 5:17). But images are forbidden by the law and the
prophets (Deut. 4:15; Isa. 44:9). He denied that his bodily presence
would be profitable for the Church, and promised that he would be near
us by his Spirit forever (John 16:7). Who, therefore, would believe that
a shadow or likeness of his body would contribute any benefit to the
pious? (II Cor. 5:5). Since he abides in us by his Spirit, we are
therefore the temple of God (II Cor. 3:16). But what agreement has the
temple of God with idols? (II Cor. 6:16).
Images
of Saints. And since the blessed spirits and saints in heaven, while
they lived here on earth, rejected all worship of themselves (Acts
3:12f.; 14:11ff.; Rev. 14:7; 22:9) and condemned images, shall anyone
find it likely that the heavenly saints and angels are pleased with
their own images before which men kneel, uncover their heads, and bestow
other honors? But in fact
in order to instruct men in religion and to remind them of divine things
and of their salvation, the Lord commanded the preaching of the Gospel
(Mark 16:15) - not to paint and to teach the laity by means of pictures.
Moreover, he instituted sacraments, but nowhere did he set up images.
The
Scriptures of the Laity. Furthermore, wherever we turn our eyes, we see
the living and true creatures of God which, if they be observed, as is
proper, make a much more vivid impression on the beholders than all the
images or vain, motionless, feeble and dead pictures made by men, of
which the prophet truly said: They have eyes, but do not see (Psa.
115:5).
Lactantius.
Therefore we approved the judgment of Lactantius, an ancient writer, who
says: "Undoubtedly no religion exists where there is an
image."
Epiphanius
and Augustine. We also assert that the blessed bishop Epiphanius did
right when, finding on the doors of a church a veil on which was painted
a picture supposedly of Christ or some saint, he ripped it down and took
it away, because to see a picture of a man hanging in the Church of
Christ was contrary to the authority of Scripture. Wherefore he charged
that from henceforth no such veils, which were contrary to our religion,
should be hung in the Church of Christ, and that rather such
questionable things, unworthy of the Church of Christ and the faithful
people, should be removed. Moreover, we approve of this opinion of St.
Augustine concerning true religion: "Let not the worship of the
works of men be a religion for us. For the artists themselves who make
such things are better; yet we ought not to worship them" (De Vera
Religione, cap. 55).
Henrich
Bullinger
“Although,
in fact, Christ assumed human nature, He did not, assume it for this
reason, that he might display a figure for the making of statues or even
for the making of pictures..." (Henrich Bullinger, Commentary on
the Second Helvetic Confession.)
“Images
are the books of the ignorant…images are not really worshipped, only
the subjects they represtn are worshipped.” This demonstrates the
fallacy of the high thoughts given to icons and images. (Henrich
Bullinger, De origine erroris, Chapter 13, Page 108ff.)
Martin
Bucer
Images
are forbidden by the first and second commandments because they always
lead to idolatry…that to set up images in churches was to invite
idolatry. God is to be
worshipped spiritually, not through images, and that the true Christian
should pay not attention to created things…images are evil and they
make God angry.” (Martin
Bucer, Das Einigerlei Bild bei den Gotglaubigen an Orten da Sie
Verehrt, Nit Mogen Geduldet Werden” (1530, DS, Volume IV, Page
167)
Jacques
Lefevere d’Etaples
“The
Word of God suffices [Verbum Dei Sufficit].
This alone is enough to effect life everlasting.
This rule is the guide to eternal life.
All else, on which the Word of God does not shine, is as
unnecessary as it is undoubtedly superfluous.
Nor should such be reckoned with the Gospel as far as the purity
of the pious worship and the integrity of faith are concerned, for it is
not the creation of God.” (Jacques
Lefevere d’Etaples, Preface to the Commentary of the Four Gospels,’
Rice, Prefatory Epistles, Page 436)
“The
superstitious have images of gold and silver, works of the hands of men
which have a mouth but will not speak, eyes and will not see. All images
appear to be prohibited by the apostle of the spirit, those worshiped by
the gentiles at home, in the fora, harbors, temples, groves, or
elsewhere as well as those which in the future might be worshiped
through the custom of the pagans as a result of declining faith. By this
prohibitory exhortation [I John 5:11), John forbids anything to be
worshiped that is not God, for whom no image can be set up.” (Jacques
Lefevere d’Etaples, Commentary on the Catholic Epistles, trans.
by Henry Heller, "Evangelicism," p. 72.)
Martin
Luther
In
the Lectures on Romans (1515-16), Luther criticized the cost of church
decoration and called material objects of worship, “mere shadows and
tokens of reality” and “childish things.” (Martin Luther, Lectures
on Romans, Luther’s Works, Volume 25, 157-159, 164-65, 192.)
In
terms of those who adore images, and use them in worship, Luther says
they are “truly idolatrous images and the devil’s hospices.”
(Martin Luther, Luther’s Works, Volume 40, 85.)
“There
is no painter that with his colors can so lively set out Christ unto
you, as I have painted him out by my preaching, and yet, notwithstanding
ye still remain most miserably bewitched.” (Martin Luther, Commentary
on Galatians, Cambridge, reprinted
1972, Page 196).
Ludwig
Haetzer
“1)
God our Father and Spouse forbids us to make images, 2) God intends to
destroy images as weak as those who posses them ad honor them, 3) the
deed of those who have done away with images and idols will be praised
and glorified.” (Ludwig
Haetzer, A Judgment of God Our Spouse Concerning How One Should
Regard All Idols and Images, Zurich, 1523.)
Ulrich
Zwingli
“They
are not believers who go to anyone else for help other than to the one
true God. For thus are the
believers differentiated from the unbelievers in that the believers, or
those whoa re trusting, go to God alone; but the unbelievers go to the
created.” (Ulrich Zwingli, Works, Volume 4, An Answer to Valentin
Compar, Zurich, 1525, Page 88.)
This work was Zwingli’s “theology of idolatry.”
Theodore
Beza
"Our
hope reposes in the true cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, not in that
image. Therefore I must admit that I thoroughly detest the image of the
crucifix...[and] cannot endure it". Beza, it should be noted,
exercised a very strong influence upon the Puritans.”
John
Calvin and the Institutes:
Calvin
forbids "making" or "having" them (Inst. 1.11.13).
"Every
figurative representation of God contradicts His being" (1.11.2)
"Even
direct signs of the divine Presence give no justification for
images" (1..11.3)
"Images
and pictures are contrary to Scripture" (1.11.4)
It
is not just the use of images for "impious superstition" that
is forbidden, but the use of pictures to educate the unlearned, in place
of books which tell about the Word of God (1.11.5)
“Christ
is depicted before the eyes as crucified by the true preaching of the
Gospel (Gal.3:1; Inst.1.11.7).
"Any
use of images leads to idolatry" (1.11.9).
"It
seems to me unworthy of their [the Churches'] holiness...to take on
images other than those living and symbolical ones which the Lord has
consecrated by His Word:...Baptism and the Lord's Supper"
(1.11.13).
"In
the Law, accordingly, after God had claimed the glory of divinity for
himself alone, when he comes to show what kind of worship he approves
and rejects, he immediately adds, ‘Thou shalt not make unto thee any
graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or
in the earth beneath, or in the water under the earth,’ (Exodus 20:
4). By these words he curbs any licentious attempt we might make to
represent him by a visible shape, and briefly enumerates all the forms
by which superstition had begun, even long before, to turn his truth
into a lie. For we know that the Sun was worshipped by the Persian. As
many stars as the foolish nations saw in the sky, so many gods they
imagined them to be. Then to the Egyptians, every animal was a figure of
God. The Greeks, again, plumed themselves on their superior wisdom in
worshipping God under the human form, (Maximum Tyrius Platonic. Serm.
38). But God makes no comparison between images, as if one were more,
and another less befitting; he rejects, without exception, all shapes
and pictures, and other symbols by which the superstitious imagine they
can bring him near to them. By
these words he curbs any licentious attempt we might make to represent
him by a visible shape, and briefly enumerates all the forms by which
superstition had begun, even long before, to turn his truth into a
lie." (1.11.1)
"Hence,
again, it is obvious, that the defenders of images resort to a paltry
quibbling evasion, when they pretend that the Jews were forbidden to use
them on account of their proneness to superstition; as if a prohibition
which the Lord founds on his own eternal essences and the uniform course
of nature, could be restricted to a single nation. Besides, when Paul
refuted the error of giving a bodily shape to God, he was addressing not
Jews, but Athenians." (1.11.2)
“That
images are not suited to represent God’s mysteries. For they had been
formed to this end, that veiling the mercy seat with their wings they
might bar not only human eyes but all the senses from beholding God, and
thus correct men’s rashness. (Calvin, Institutes, 1:11:3)
"It
is true that the Lord occasionally manifested his presence by certain
signs, so that he was said to be seen face to face; but all the signs he
ever employed were in apt accordance with the scheme of doctrine, and,
at the same time, gave plain intimation of his incomprehensible essence.
For the cloud, and smoke, and flame, though they were symbols of
heavenly glory, (Deuteronomy 4:11,) curbed men's minds as with a bridle,
that they might not attempt to penetrate farther. Therefore, even Moses
(to whom, of all men, God manifested himself most familiarly) was not
permitted though he prayed for it, to behold that face, but received for
answer, that the refulgence was too great for man, (Exodus 33:20.)"
(1.11.3)
"The
Holy Spirit appeared under the form of a dove, but as it instantly
vanished, who does not see that in this symbol of a moment, the faithful
were admonished to regard the Spirit as invisible, to be contented with
his power and grace, and not call for any external figure? God sometimes
appeared in the form of a man, but this was in anticipation of the
future revelation in Christ, and, therefore, did not give the Jews the
least pretext for setting up a symbol of Deity under the human form.
" (1.11.3)
"It
is, moreover, to be observed, that by the mode of expression which is
employed, every form of superstition is denounced. Being works of men,
they have no authority from God, (Isaiah 2:8, 31:7; Hosea. 14:3; Micah.
5:13;) and, therefore, it must be regarded as a fixed principle, that
all modes of worship devised by man are detestable." (1.11.4)
"And
it is to be observed, that the thing forbidden is likeness, whether
sculptured or otherwise. This disposes of the frivolous precaution taken
by the Greek Church. They think they do admirably, because they have no
sculptured shape of Deity, while none go greater lengths in the
licentious use of pictures. The Lord, however, not only forbids any
image of himself to be erected by a statuary, but to be formed by any
artist whatever, because every such image is sinful and insulting to his
majesty." (1.11.4)
"This
at least I maintain, that when we teach that all human attempts to give
a visible shape to God are vanity and lies, we do nothing more than
state verbatim what the prophets taught." (1.11.5)
"For
when Jeremiah declares that ‘the stock is a doctrine of vanities,’
(Jeremiah 10:8,) and Habakkuk, ‘that the molten image’ is ‘a
teacher of lies,’ the general doctrine to be inferred certainly is,
that every thing respecting God which is learned from images is futile
and false. If it is objected that the censure of the prophets is
directed against those who perverted images to purposes of impious
superstition, I admit it to be so; but I add, (what must be obvious to
all,) that the prophets utterly condemn what the Papists hold to be an
undoubted axiom, viz., that images are substitutes for books."
(Institutes 1.11.5)
"The
truth of this latter remark I wish we did not so thoroughly experience.
Whosoever, therefore, is desirous of being instructed in the true
knowledge of God must apply to some other teacher than images."
(1.11.6)
"The
simple reason why those who had the charge of churches resigned the
office of teaching to idols was, because they themselves were dumb. Paul
declares, that by the true preaching of the gospel Christ is portrayed
and in a manner crucified before our eyes, (Gal. 3:1.) Of what use,
then, were the erection in churches of so many crosses of wood and
stone, silver and gold, if this doctrine were faithfully and honestly
preached, viz., Christ died that he might bear our curse upon the tree,
that he might expiate our sins by the sacrifice of his body, wash them
in his blood, and, in short, reconcile us to God the Father? From this
one doctrine the people would learn more than from a thousand crosses of
wood and stone. As for crosses of gold and silver, it may be true that
the avaricious give their eyes and minds to them more eagerly than to
any heavenly instructor." (1.11.7)
"It
makes no difference whether they worship the idol simply, or God in the
idol; it is always idolatry when divine honors are paid to an idol, be
the color what it may. And because God wills not to be worshipped
superstitiously whatever is bestowed upon idols is so much robbed from
him." (1.11.9)
"They
say, we do not call them our gods. Nor did either the Jews or Gentiles
of old so call them; and yet the prophets never ceased to charge them
with their adulteries with wood and stone for the very acts which are
daily done by those who would be deemed Christians, namely, for
worshipping God carnally in wood and stone." (1.11.10)
"For
as a murderer or an adulterer will not escape conviction by giving some
adventitious name to his crime, so it is absurd for them to expect that
the subtle device of a name will exculpate them, if they, in fact,
differ in nothing from idolaters whom they themselves are forced to
condemn. But so far are they from proving that their case is different,
that the source of the whole evil consists in a preposterous rivalship
with them, while they with their minds devise, and with their hands
execute, symbolical shapes of God." (1.11.11)
"First,
then, if we attach any weight to the authority of the ancient Church,
let us remember, that for five hundred years, during which religion was
in a more prosperous condition, and a purer doctrine flourished,
Christian churches were completely free from visible representations,
(see Preface, and Book 4, c. 9 s. 9.) Hence their first admission as an
ornament to churches took place after the purity of the ministry had
somewhat degenerated. I will not dispute as to the rationality of the
grounds on which the first introduction of them proceeded, but if you
compare the two periods, you will find that the latter had greatly
declined from the purity of the times when images were unknown."
(1.11.13)
"And
from the fearful infatuation under which the world has hitherto labored,
almost to the entire destruction of piety, we know too well from
experience that the moment images appear in churches, idolatry has as it
were raised its banner; because the folly of manhood cannot moderate
itself, but forthwith falls away to superstitious worship. Even were the
danger less imminent, still, when I consider the proper end for which
churches are erected, it appears to me more unbecoming their sacredness
than I well can tell, to admit any other images than those living
symbols which the Lord has consecrated by his own word: I mean Baptism
and the Lord's Supper, with the other ceremonies. " (1.11.13)
“The
majesty of God is defiled by an absurd and indecorous fiction, when he
who is incorporeal is assimilated to corporeal matter; he who is
invisible to a visible image; he who is spirit to an inanimate object;
and he who fills all space to a bit of paltry wood, or stone, or
gold.... Hence it is manifest, that whatever statues are set up or
pictures painted to represent God, are utterly displeasing to him, as a
kind of insult to his majesty" (1:11. pp. 91-92).
Calvin’s
Commentaries on the Second Commandment
"In
the First Commandment, after He had taught who was the true God, He
commanded that he alone should be worshipped; and now He defines what is
His legitimate worship. Now, since these are two distinct things, we
conclude that the commandments are also distinct, in which different
things are treated of. The former indeed proceeds in order, viz, that
believers are to be contented with one God; but it would not be
sufficient for us to be instructed to worship Him alone, unless we also
knew the manner in which He would be worshipped. The sum is, that the
worship of God must be spiritual, in order that it may correspond with
His nature. For although Moses only speaks of idolatry, yet there is no
doubt but that by synecdoche, as in all the rest of the law, he condemns
all fictitious services which men in their ingenuity have
invented." Comment on Ex. 20:4-6; Deut. 5:8-10, Harmony of the Last
Four Books of Moses, Vol. II, p. 107.
"There
is no need of refuting the foolish fancy of some, that all sculptures
and pictures are here condemned by Moses, for he had no other object
than to rescue God’s glory from all the imaginations which tend to
corrupt it…. Some expound the words, ‘Thou shalt not make to thyself
a graven image, which thou mayest adore;’ as if it were allowable to
make a visible image of God, provided it be not adored; but the
expositions which will follow will easilty refute their error.
Meanwhile, I do not deny that these things are to be taken connectedly,
since superstitious worship is hardly ever separated from the preceding
error; for as soon as any one has permitted himself to devise an image
of God, he immediately falls into false worship." Comment on Ex.
20:4-6; Deut. 5:8-10, Harmony of the Last Four Books of Moses, Vol. II,
p. 108.
"The
word matzebhah is sometimes used in a good sense; whence it follows,
that no other statues are here condemned, except those which are erected
as representations of God." Comment on Ex. 20:4-6; Deut. 5:8-10,
Harmony of the Last Four Books of Moses, Vol. II, p. 117.
"Whence
it appears that this insane lust (of idolatry) is not to be repressed by
ordinary means. With the same object he says that they are ‘corrupted,
or corrupt themselves,’ who make any similitude of God. Thus Paul also
declares that in this way the truth is changed into a lie, (Romans 1:25)
and Jeremiah and Habakkuk condemn images for their falsehood (Jeremiah
10:14; Habakkuk 2:18). No wonder, then, that an idol should be called
the ‘corruption’ of men, since it adulterates the worship of God;
and it is a most just recompense to those who pollute the pure and
perfect knowledge of God, that they should be thence infected with a
rottenness which consumes their souls." Comment on Deut. 4:12ff.,
Harmony of the Last Four Books of Moses, Vol. II, p. 121.
"Now
we must remark, that there are two parts in the Commandment – the
first forbids the erection of a graven image, or any likeness; the
second prohibits the transferring of the worship which God claims for
Himself alone, to any of these phantoms or delusive shows. Therefore, to
devise any image of God, is in itself impious; because by this
corruption His Majesty is adulterated, and He is figured to be other
than he is. There is no need of refuting the foolish fancy of some, that
all sculptures and pictures are here condemned by Moses, for he had no
other object than to rescue God's glory from all the imaginations which
tend to corrupt it." Comment on Deut. 4:12ff., Harmony of the Last
Four Books of Moses, Vol. II, p. 108.
"For
unbelievers have never been carried away to such an extent of folly as
to adore mere statues or pictures; they have always alleged the same
pretext which now-a-days is rife in the mouths of Papists, viz., that
not the image itself was actually worshipped, but that which it
represented." Comment on Deut. 4:12ff., Harmony of the Last Four
Books of Moses, Vol. II, p. 109.
John
Calvin, Treatise on Relics
“As
soon as anyone has devised an image of God, they have instituted false
worship. The object of Moses is to restrain the rashness of men, lest
they should travesty God's glory by their imaginations.”
The
church in the beginning tolerated these abuses, as a temporary evil, but
was afterwards unable to remove them; and they became so strong,
particularly during the prevailing ignorance of the middle ages, that
the church ended by legalizing, through her decrees, that at which she
did nothing but wink at first. I shall endeavor to give my readers a
rapid sketch of the rise, progress, and final
establishment
of the Pagan practices which not only continue to prevail in the Western
as well as in the Eastern church, but have been of late, notwithstanding
the boasted progress of intellect in our days, manifested in as bold as
successful a manner. (Page 8)
It
appears, however, that the use of pictures was creeping into the church
already
in the third century, because the council of Elvira in Spain, held in
305,
especially forbids to have any picture in the Christian churches. (Page
11)
Such
a practice was, however, fraught with the greatest danger, as experience
has but too much proved. It was replacing intellect by sight. Instead of
elevating man towards God, it was bringing down the Deity to the level
of his finite intellect, and it could not but powerfully contribute to
the rapid spread of a pagan anthropomorphism in the church. (Page 11)
Now,
the origin and root of this evil, has been, that, instead of discerning
Jesus Christ in his Word, his Sacraments, and his Spiritual Graces, the
world has, according to its ‘custom, amused itself with his clothes,
shirts, and sheets, leaving thus the principal to follow the accessory.
(Page 133)
I
know well that there is a certain appearance of real devotion and zeal
in the allegation, that the relics of Jesus Christ are preserved on
account of the honor that is rendered to him, and in order the better to
preserve his memory. But it is necessary to consider what St Paul says,
that every service of God invented by man, whatever appearance of wisdom
it may have, is nothing better than vanity and foolishness, if it has no
other foundation than our own devising. (Page 133)
Fisher’s
Catechism
Fisher's
Catechism (Question 51). Written in 1753 by the three founders of the
Associate Presbytery in Scotland: James Fisher, Ralph Erskine and
Ebenezer Erskine. “Question. -Why then ought all pictures of Christ to
be abominated by Christians? Answer - Because they are downright lies,
representing no more than the picture of a mere man; whereas the true
Christ is God-man; Immanuel, God with us."
Francis
Turretin
“Any
religious worship should not be paid to images; thinking piously
before an image is forbidden. We condemn here the treatment of sacred or
religious images that are supposed to contribute something to the
excitement of religious feeling. God forbids the making of them and the
worship of them.” (Francis Turretin, Institutes of Elenctic
Theology, Volume 2, P&R Publishing Company, Ninth Question, Page
51ff).
“When
the apostle says that “Jesus Christ had been evidently set forth
before the eyes of the Galatians, crucified among them (Gal. 3:1), he
does not speak of fashioning of images of the crucifix 9which were made
either by the brush of the painter or the chisel of the sculptor), but
of the preaching of the Gospel, by which he is exhibited to us as
crucified…the honor fo the image does not pass over to the prototype
and exemplar, unless he himself (whi cis the exemplar) has so willed or
ordained. But if on the
contrary he has prohibited any image of himself to be made or to be
honored, he is treated injuriously if anyone goes against his will.”
(Francis Turretin, Institutes of Elenctic Theology, Volume
2, P&R Publishing Company, Ninth Question, Page 61ff).
“Whether
not only the worship but also the formation and use of religious images
in sacred places is prohibited by the second commandment?
We affirm against the Lutherans.
We do not condemn historical representations of events or of
great men. Either symbolical…or political…But here we treat of
sacred and religious images which are supposed to contribute something
to the excitation of religious feeling.
God expressly forbids this in the second commandment…images are
prohibited not only inasmuch as they are the object or the means of
worship, but inasmuch as they are made simply for the sake of religion
or are set up in sacred places…from the mental image to a sculpted or
painted image, the consequence does not hold good.
Hence it is falsity asserted that it is no less a sin to present
images of certain things tot eh mind or commit them to writing and
exhibit them to be read, than to present them to the view when painted.
For there is a wide difference between these things.
(Francis Turretin, Institutes of Elenctic Theology, Volume
2, P&R Publishing Company, Ninth Question, Page 65).
James
Durham
1.
We simply condemn any delineating of God, or the Godhead, or Trinity;
such as some have upon their buildings, or books, like a sun shining
with beams, and the Lord’s name, Jehovah, in it or any other way….
2. All representing of the persons as distinct, as to set out the Father
(personally considered) by the image of an old man, as if he were a
creature, the Son under the image of a lamb or young man, the Holy Ghost
under the image of a dove, all which wrongeth the Godhead exceedingly.
James
Durham, The Law Unsealed: or, A Practical Exposition of the Ten
Commandments. With a Resolution of Several Momentous Questions and
Cases of Conscience (Edinburgh: D. Schaw, 1802) 67.
Thomas Boston says the exact same thing in The Complete Works
of the Late Rev. Thomas Boston, Ettrick (ed. Samuel M’ Millan; 12
vols.; London: William Tegg and Co., 1853; reprinted Wheaton: Richard
Owen Roberts, 1980) 2.150.
“And
if it be said man’s soul cannot be painted, but his body may, and yet
that picture representeth a man; I answer, it cloth so, because he has
but one nature, and what representeth that representeth the person; but
it is not so with Christ: his Godhead is not a distinct part of the
human nature, as the soul of man is (which is necessarily supposed in
every living man), but a distinct nature, only united with the manhood
in that one person, Christ, who has no fellow; therefore what
representeth him must not represent a man only, but must represent
Christ, Immanuel, God-man, otherwise it is not his image.”
(James Durham, The Law Unsealed: or, A Practical Exposition of the
Ten Commandments. With a Resolution of Several Momentous Questions
and Cases of Conscience (Edinburgh: D. Schaw, 1802) 68.)
“There
should not be in us any carnal apprehensions of God, as if he were like
any thing that we could imagine.” James
Durham, The Law Unsealed: or, A Practical Exposition of the Ten
Commandments. With a Resolution of Several Momentous Questions and
Cases of Conscience (Edinburgh: D. Schaw, 1802) 64.
“It
is not lawful to have pictures of Jesus Christ…because, if it does not
stir up devotion, it is in vain, if it does stir up devotion, it is a
worshipping by an image or picture, and so a palpable breach of the
second commandment.” (James Durham, The Law Unsealed: or, A
Practical Exposition of the Ten Commandments. With a Resolution of
Several Momentous Questions and Cases of Conscience (Edinburgh: D. Schaw,
1802) 64.)
Thomas
Vincent
“The
images or pictures of God are an abomination and utterly unlawful,
because they do debase God, and may be the cause of idolatrous worship. It is not lawful to have pictures of Jesus Christ, because
his divine nature cannot be pictured at all, and because his body, as it
is now glorified, cannot be pictured as it is; and because, if it do not
stir up devotion, it is in vain; if it do stir up devotion, it is a
worshipping by an image or picture, and so a palpable breach of the
second commandment.” (Thomas Vincent, An Explanation of the
Assembly’s Shorter Catechism (Philadelphia: Presbyterian Board of
Publication, n.d.) 162.)
“When
they have in their worship carnal imaginations, and representations of
God in their minds, as if he were an old man sitting in heaven, or the
like.” Thomas
Vincent, Explanation , 161.
“We
offend and sin against the second commandment not only by idolatry and
superstition, but also when we are not zealous for pure worship,
according to God’s institution…according to the pattern of the
Word.” (Thomas Vincent, The
Shorter Catechism Explained from Scripture, Banner of Truth Trust,
Page 128)
Ezekiel
Hopkins
“The
sins forbidden in [the second commandment] are two: Contempt of the
worship of God; and Superstition in performing it…Idolatry is a part
and species of superstition…they [idolaters] pretend to worship the
true God by an image…[it] is gross idolatry.
(Ezekiel Hopkins, Works, volume 1, Soli Deo Gloria, Page
329, 330.)
Wilhemus
a’Brakel
“Are
men permitted to make images of God – that is, of the Father, Son or
the Holy Spirit? We declare
that the making of images of the Trinity is absolutely forbidden…it is
vanity to make an image and say that is Christ. We may not honor Christ…in this manner. Objection…the images of God are of educational
value…Answer: God has nevertheless forbidden this.
This is pagan thinking and we should not pretend it to be
beneficial, since it is forbidden.” (Wilhemus a’Brakel, The
Christian’s Reasonable Service, Volume 3, Soli Deo Gloria, Page
108, 109, 110)
Richard
Sibbes
“And
then again, idolatry frameth base conceits of God. Whereas, on
the contrary, we should elevate and raise up our hearts unto him ;
idolatry pulls him down, and conforms him to our base conceits. Were it
not a wrong to man to make him like a swine, or an ape, or some such
ridiculous creature ? Who, in this case, would think himself well used?
There is not such disproportion betwixt any creature and man as there is
betwixt the great God of heaven and earth, and the best creature that
can be made to resemble him. Therefore, it is an abominable abuse and
dishonour to the great majesty of God to be represented any kind of way.
Again,
consider the opposition between any representation of God, and God.
They are corruptible things ; God is incorruptible. They are visible;
God is invisible. They are vain and nothing; God a being of himself, who
giveth being unto all things. God is the living God, and the cause of
all life. To be brief: the Scripture, to shew God's hatred of them,
calleth them dunghill-gods, and Abel, as it is in this book, vanity,
nothing, a name to alienate the affections from them.
Yea,
further, because God is a jealous Grid, |