Christ the Mediator
This sermon describes the work of
Christ in His threefold office, His person, and His human and divine
nature.
The
Mediator of the Covenant
Described in His Person, Nature, and Offices
by Dr. William
Whitaker
William Whitaker
(1548-1595) is one of the first great gifted Cambridge Puritan
theologians. He is the author of the best rebuttal and debate on the
authority of Scripture against the Roman Catholics called Disputations
on Holy Scripture, and a contributor to the Lambeth Articles.
He was born in Holme, Lancashire. This excerpt is taken from: Puritan
Sermons 1659-1689, The Morning Exercises at Cripplegate, vol. 5,
sermon 13.
“There
is one Mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus”—1
Tim. 2: 5.
In
the words [we have],
I.
The only way of friendly intercourse between God and man. — It is through a Mediator; that is implied. Whether man in the state
of innocency needed a Mediator, is disputed among persons learned and
sober; but in his lapsed state, this need is acknowledged by all. God
cannot now look upon men out of a Mediator but as rebels, traitors, as
fit objects for his vindictive wrath; nor can men now look up to God but
as a provoked Majesty, an angry Judge, a consuming fire. And therefore
were it not for a Mediator, (that is, a middle person interposing
between God and us, who are at variance, to procure reconciliation and
friendship) we could not but so dread the presence of this God, that,
like our first parents, (in that dark interval betwixt their sinning,
and the succour of that promise, Gen. 3:15) we should have endeavoured
to hide ourselves what we could “from the presence of the Lord”
(Gen. 3:8).
II.
The only Mediator between God and men.
— “One Mediator,” that is, but one. Papists acknowledge one
Mediator of reconciliation, but contend for many of intercession. But as
God, in the former part of this verse, is said to be one God, by way of
exclusion of all others; so is Christ said here to be “one
Mediator,” that is, but one.
This
Mediator is here described partly by his nature: “The man”
and partly by his names: “Christ Jesus.”
A.
His nature: “The
man” that is, “That eminent man,” so some; “He that was made
man,” so others.
OBJECTION:
“But why is this Mediator mentioned in this nature only?”
ANSWER:
1.
Negatively: not by way of diminution, as if he were not God as
well as man, as the Arians argue from this scripture; nor as if the
execution of his mediatorship were either only, or chiefly, in his human
nature, as some of the Papists affirm.
2.
Positively: to prove that Jesus Christ was the true Messiah whom
the prophets foretold, the fathers expected, and who had in that nature
been so frequently promised: as in the first gospel that ever was
preached (Gen. 3:15), he is promised as the Seed of the woman. Besides,
the apostle mentions Christ in this nature, only as an encouragement to
that duty of prayer [which] he had before persuaded; to the like purpose
he is mentioned in this nature only. (Heb 4:14-16).
B.
His names: “Christ
Jesus.” Jesus, this was his proper name; Christ, this
was his appellative name.
Jesus:
that denotes the work and business for which he came into the world; as
appears from the reason which the angel, that came from heaven as a
herald to proclaim his incarnation, gives of the imposition of this
name: “Thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall save his people
from their sins” (Matt. 1:21). This name, though it be given to others
in Scripture, yet to him eminently; to them as types of that complete
Savior who should come after them, and “save His people from their
sins.”
Christ:
that denotes the several offices, in the exercise whereof he executes
this work of salvation; Christ in the Greek being the same with Messiah
in the Hebrew; that is, “anointed.” Under the law, the solemn
ordination, or setting apart, both of things and persons, to special
services, was by anointing. Thus we read of three sorts of persons
anointed: kings, priests, prophets; and in respect of all these offices,
Jesus is called Christ.
From
the words thus briefly explained arise these two observations
DOCTRINE
1: That there is now no other way of friendly communion between God
and man, but through a Mediator
— And, indeed, considering what God is, and withal what man is; how
vastly disproportionable, how unspeakably unsuitable our very natures
are to his; how is it possible there should be any sweet communion
betwixt them, who are not only so infinitely distant, but so extremely
contrary? God is holy, but we are sinful. In him is nothing but light,
in us nothing but darkness. In him nothing that is evil, in us nothing
that is good. He is all beauty, we nothing but deformity. He is justice,
and we guiltiness. He “a consuming fire,” and we but dried stubble
(Isa. 6:3, with Gen. 3:5; 1 John 1:5, with Eph. 5:8; Rom. 7:18). In a
word: he an infinitely and incomprehensibly glorious majesty, and we
poor sinful dust and ashes, who have sunk and debased ourselves by sin
below the meanest rank of creatures, and made ourselves the burden of
the whole creation. And can there be any communion, any friendship,
between such? “Can two walk together, except they be agreed?” (Amos
3:3). And what agreement can there ever be but through a Mediator?
If
ever God be reconciled to us, it must be through a Mediator; because of
that indispensable necessity of satisfaction, and our inability to make
it (Rom. 8:7). If ever we be reconciled to God, it must be through a
Mediator; because of that radicated enmity that is in our natures to
every thing of God, and our impotency to it. And thus in both respects
– that God may be willing to be a friend to us, and that we may not be
unwilling to be friends to him – there needs a Mediator (2Co 5:19 cf.
John 14:6).
DOCTRINE
2: That there is no other Mediator between God and man, but Jesus
Christ. “And
one Mediator” that is, but one. The fondness of Papists in their
multiplicity of mediators, not only unto God, but to our Mediator
himself, having no other foundation than only their superstition, cannot
be of moment with them who labor to be wise according to Scripture. That
those members of the church who are contemporary here on earth do indeed
pray for one another, cannot be denied; but that they are therefore
mediators of intercession, hath been denied by the more ancient Papists
themselves. This title of Mediator is throughout the New Testament
appropriated unto Christ (Heb 8:6; 9:15; 12:24). And indeed there is
none else fit for so high a work as this but only he.
REASON
1: The singular suitableness of his PERSON to this eminent
employment. To
interpose as a Mediator betwixt God and men, was an employment above the
capacity of men, angels, or any other creature; but Jesus Christ, in
respect of the dignity of his person, was every way suited for this
work. Which you may take in these four particulars:
A.
That he was truly God, equal with the Father, of the same nature and
substance. Not only homoiousios
(of the like nature), but homoousios (of the same nature) as is
excellently cleared by that famous champion for the deity of Christ
against the Arians, Athanasius. “In him dwelleth all the fulness of
the Godhead bodily” (Col. 2:9). “It is not the fulness of the
Divinity, but of the Deity” thereby intimating an identity of essence
with God the Father and Holy Ghost. Though the divine essence be after a
several manner in the several persons of the blessed Trinity – in the
Father, “without receiving it from any other,” in the Son by an
eternal generation, and in the Holy Ghost by proceeding – yet it is
the same essence of God that is in all three persons; because such is
the infinite simplicity of this essence, that it cannot be divided or
parceled. Thus Christ (not to speak any thing concerning the other
persons) is styled so the Son of God, as one equal with the Father; for
upon this it is that the Jews ground their charge of blasphemy against
him, that “he said God was his Father, making himself equal with
God” (John 5:18). The force of their reason lies in this: the natural
Son of God is truly God, and equal with God; as the natural son of man
is man, equal, and of the same substance, with his Father. Angels and
men are the sons of God by adoption; but Christ is the natural Son of
God, the only Son of God, and therefore truly God “I and my Father are
one” (John 10:30). He “thought it not robbery to be equal with
God” (Phil. 2:6).
For
the further confirmation of this, take these arguments:
1.
He whom scripture honours with all those names which are peculiar unto
God, must needs be God.
That Christ hath these names ascribed to him appears from these
instances: He is not only styled God: “The Word was God” (John1:1);
but God with such additional discriminations, as neither magistrates
who, because they are God’s deputies and vicegerents here on earth,
are sometimes called “gods,” (Psa. 82:6) nor any creature is capable
of: “The great God” (Titus 2: 13); “The true God” (1 John 5:20);
“The mighty God” (Isa. 9:6); “Overall, God blessed for ever”
(Rom. 9:5); “The Lord of glory” (1 Cor. 2:8); “The Lord from
heaven” (1 Cor. 15:47); yea, that great name Jehovah “The Lord”
(or, “Jehovah”) “our righteousness” (Jer. 23:6).
2.
He in whom are those high and eminent perfections, those glorious
attributes, of which no creature is capable, must needs be more than a
creature, and consequently God.
a.
He that is omnipotent, whose power is boundless and unlimited, must
needs be God. The highest power of creatures hath its non ultra;
thus far may it go, “but no further”; but Christ is said to be
“Almighty” (Rev. 1:8), “The Lord God omnipotent” (Rev. 19:6).
b.
He that is omniscient, that searcheth hearts, that hath a window
into every man’s breast, that can look into all the rooms and corners
of our souls, that can see through all those veils and coverings which
no creature-eye can pierce, must needs be God. And these are the
excellencies ascribed to Christ: “He needed not that any should
testify of man, because he knew what was in man” (John 2:25); “I am
he which searcheth the heart and reins” (Rev. 2: 23); “He knew their
thoughts” (Luke 6:8. So Mark 2:8; John 13:19, 21-27, &c.).
c.
He that fills heaven and earth and all places with his presence, must
needs be God. And thus was Christ in heaven, while he was on earth:
“The Son of man which is in heaven” (John 3:13); “That where I
am” (John 14:3). Christ as God was then in heaven, when as man he was
on earth; so as God he is still on earth, though as man he sits at the
right hand of God in heaven: “I” will be “with you to the end of
the world” (Matt. 28:20).
d
. He that is immutable and eternal must needs be God. “The
heavens are the work of thy hands. They shall perish, but thou shalt
endure: yea, all of them shall wax old like a garment; as a vesture
shalt thou change them, and they shall be changed: but thou art the
same, and thy years shall have no end” (Psa. 102:25-27). So is Christ
“the everlasting Father” (Isa 9:6); “The same yesterday, and
today, and for ever” (Heb. 13:8).
e.
He that hath life in himself, and is the fountain of life to others,
must needs be God. And thus is Christ “the Prince of life” to
others, (Acts 3:15) and hath “life in himself” (John 5:26).
3.
He to whom those works of infiniteness are ascribed, to which no less a
power is sufficient than that of Omnipotency, he must needs be more than
a creature. H e that
laid the foundation of the earth, that by a word commanded all things
out of nothing, that preserves them from mouldering, and sinking into
their first nothing again; that could pardon sin, destroy him that had
the power of death, subdue principalities and powers, redeem his church,
carry his people triumphing into heaven (Mark 2:5, 7-10, &c.; Heb.
2:13-15), he must needs be God. And all these works of infiniteness are
ascribed to Christ: the work of creation: “Without him was not any
thing made that was made “(John 1:3); of conservation: “Upholding
all things by the word of his power” (Heb. 1:3); of redemption:
“Which he purchased with his blood” (Acts 20:28).
4.
He whom angels adore, before whom the highest and best of creatures fall
down, giving that worship which is peculiarly due to God, must needs be
more than a creature.
And thus it is to Christ: “Let all the angels of God worship him”
(Heb. 1:6 So Matt. 2:11).
I
might add the equality of Christ in all those solemn benedictions and
praises upon record in the New Testament; all which argue strongly, that
he must needs be truly God.
B.
As he is truly God, so is he complete and perfect man;
having not only a human body, but a rational soul; and in all things was
like to us, sin only excepted.
That
he had a real, not an imaginary, body, appears from the whole story of
the gospel. He that was conceived, born, circumcised, was hungred,
athirst, sweat drops of blood, was crucified; he that went from place to
place, and had all those sinless affections which are proper unto
bodies; had a true and real body: and such was the body of Christ.
That
he had a human soul is clear also from the story of the gospel. He that
grew in wisdom and knowledge, as it is said of Christ; (Luke 1:80; 2:40)
he whose knowledge was bounded and limited, as was also said of Christ:
“Of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which
are in heaven, neither the Son” of man, “but the Father” (Mark
13:32). As God, he knew all things; as man, his knowledge was but the
knowledge of a creature, and therefore finite. All which argue [that] he
had a human soul, as well as body, and was complete man. The whole
nature of man was corrupted, destroyed; and therefore it was needful
[that] Christ should take upon him whole man, that the whole might be
repaired and saved.
C.
He is God and man in one person.
He had two natures, but was but one person: there was a twofold
substance, divine and human, but not a twofold subsistence; for, the
personal being which the Son of God had before all worlds, suffered not
the substance to be personal which he took, although, together with the
nature which he had, the nature which he took continue for ever. Thus
both natures make but one Christ. He was the Son of God, and the Son of
man; yet not two Sons, but one person. He was born of God, and born of a
virgin; but it is in respect of his different natures. Thus was Christ
David’s Son, and David’s Lord; Mary’s Son, and Mary’s Saviour
and Maker too.
By
the right understanding of this, we may be very much helped in
reconciling those seeming contradictions which frequently occur in
scripture concerning Christ. He is said to be born of a woman, and yet
to be without “beginning of days.” Himself says his Father is
greater than he, and yet he is said to be equal with the Father. All
which may be cleared by this: he was but one person; and therefore, as
in man, who consists of soul and body, the actions of each part are
ascribed to the person (the man is said to understand: it is not his
body, but soul, that understands; yet this is ascribed to the person,
though it be but the formal act of one part); so in regard of this
hypostatical union of two natures in one person, the acts of each nature
are ascribed to the person. Thus it is said, the Jews “crucified the
Lord of glory” (1 Cor. 2:8); that is, they crucified that person who
was the Lord of glory. In Acts 20:28, God is said to purchase his church
by his blood: as God, he could not shed his blood; but it was that
person who was God. Thus is Christ said to be in heaven, when he was on
earth; that is, as God, he was in heaven. And so what is proper to each
nature, by reason of the hypostatical union, is ascribed to the whole
person.
D.
This union of two natures in one person is without confusion or
transmutation; the natures remaining distinct, and the properties and
operations of both natures distinct, notwithstanding this union.
Some things are proper to the Godhead, of which the manhood is
incapable; and some things proper to the manhood, of which the Godhead
is incapable. We cannot say, the Godhead was athirst, weary, died;
neither can we say, the manhood was the fountain of all being, the
Creator and Preserver of all things; or that it is ubiqitary or
omnipresent; though we may say all of the same person.
It
is observed by learned writers, that the dividing of the person which is
but one, and the confounding of the natures which are two, have
occasioned those grand errors in this article of faith, by which the
peace of the church hath been so much disturbed. And suitably to these
four heads that have been spoken to, there have arisen four several
heresies:
1.
The Arians, denying the Deity of Christ; against whom the council
of Nice determined that he was “truly God.”
2.
The Apollinarians, who maimed and misinterpreted his human
nature; against whom the council of Constantinople determined, that he
was “complete and perfect man.”
3.
The Nestorians, who divided Christ into two persons, because of
his two natures; against whom the council of Ephesus determined, that he
was Godman in one person, “without separation.”
4.
The Eutychians, who confounded these two natures in one person;
against whom the council of Chalcedon determined, that he was God-man in
one person, “without confusion or mutation” of natures.
But
in the four above-named heads enough hath been said by way of antidote
against those dangerous mistakes. And, all being duly considered, we
cannot but see great reason why he should be called “Wonderful” (Isa
9:6). Well might the apostle cry out by way of admiration: “Without
controversy great is the mystery of god lines: God was manifest in the
flesh” (1 Tim. 3:16).
E.
The singular fitness of Christ for this work of mediation arises from
his being God-man in two natures, united in one person without confusion
or transmutation.
1.
Had he not been truly God, he had been too mean a person for so high an
employment. It was God that had been offended, an infinite Majesty that
had been despised; the person therefore interposing must have some
equality with him to whom he interposes. Had the whole society of
persevering angels interposed on man’s behalf, it had been to little
purpose; one Christ was infinitely more than all, and that because he
was truly God.
2.
Had he not been completely man, he had been no way capable of performing
that indispensably necessary condition, upon which God was willing to be
reconciled; namely, the satisfying of that righteous sentence [which]
God had pronounced: “In the day that thou eatest thereof, thou shalt
surely die” (Gen. 2:17). That therefore he might be capable of dying
(which as God he could not), and that the justice of God might be
satisfied in the same nature by which it had been offended, it was
necessary he should be man.
3.
Had he not been God and man in one person, the sufferings of his human
nature could not have derived that infinite value from the divine
nature. We could not have called his blood “the blood of God,” as it
is called Acts 20:28; it would have been no more than the blood of a
creature, and consequently as unavailable as the blood of bulls, &c.
(Heb. 9:12; 10:4).
4.
Had he not been God-man without confusion of natures, his Deity might
either have advanced his humanity above the capacity of suffering; or
his humanity might have debased his Deity below the capability of
meriting, which is no less than blasphemy to imagine.
And
this is the first reason, the singular fitness of Christ for this work,
because of the dignity of his person.
REASON
2: The singular
fitness of Christ for this employment in respect of the suitableness of
his offices. There is a threefold misery upon all men, or a
threefold bar to communion with God.
1.
The guilt of their sins, which themselves are never able to
expiate, or satisfy for.
2.
The blindness of their minds, the cure whereof is too difficult
for any creature-physician.
3.
Their bondage and captivity to sin and Satan, which are enemies
too strong for man to deal with.
Suitably
to these three great necessities, Jesus Christ is anointed of God to a
threefold office, of a Priest, a Prophet, a King; the former of which
offices he exercises on our behalf to God, and the last two from God to
us.
A.
The priestly office of Christ is the great, the only relief we have
against the guilt of sin.
The work of the priesthood consisted, under the law, chiefly of these
two parts:
1.
Satisfaction for the sins of the people (Lev. 4:15-19, &c).
2. Intercession unto God on their behalf (Lev. 16:15-17).
Both which were verified in Christ our
“great High Priest” (Heb. 4:14). And hence it is that the apostle
encourages us to “come with boldness unto the throne of grace”
(Verse 16). What was done by others typically, was done by Christ
really.
1. His satisfaction,
in discharging those debts which his people had run into with Divine
Justice to the utmost farthing. And this he did by offering up that one
single sacrifice which was infinitely more worth than all those
multitudes of sacrifices offered up of old, and from which all former
sacrifices had their virtue and efficacy. The priests of old offered up
creatures, but this High Priest offers up himself (Eph. 5:2). They
offered the blood of bullocks, &c (Heb. 9:12, 13), but Christ, the
blood of God (Acts 20:28). They offered many sacrifices, and Christ but
one; but such an one as infinitely exceeded all their many; such an one
as “perfected for ever them that are sanctified” (Heb. 10:14). One
sun is worth more than thousands of stars, and one jewel than millions
of ordinary stones; and so one Christ is more effectual than all
Lebanon, or “the cattle on a thousand hills.”
2. His intercession:
this is the other part of his priestly office. His satisfaction, —
that was performed on earth; his intercession is performed chiefly in
heaven. By the former he purchased pardon and reconciliation (2 Cor.
5:19, cf. v. 21); by the latter he applies the benefits he hath
purchased. His sufferings, though they were but while he was on earth,
yet the benefit of them extends to all ages of the church, both before
and since his passion; and his intercession is that which sues out these
blessings for his people; and therefore that great apostle joins both
together as the foundation of all his comfort : “Christ hath died, who
still maketh intercession” (Rom 8:34); and both these are so full, so
sufficient a relief against the guilt of sin, that as we have no other,
so we need no other. As the high priests bore the names of the people
before the Lord, so does Jesus Christ the names of his elect. But the
high priests of old were at certain times only to appear before the
Lord, once a year to enter into the holy place; but Christ, our
spiritual High Priest, is not only entered, but sat down at the right
hand of God, to negotiate constantly on his church’s behalf: “He
ever liveth to make intercession” (Heb. 9:12, 24, 25; 10:12; 7:25; 1
John 2:1). And besides the constancy, consider the prevalency of his
intercession; that God that regards the cry of ravens, that will not
altogether neglect the humiliation of Ahab, that God that is so ready to
answer and honor the prayers of his own people, cannot but much more re
g a rd the prayers of his only Son, praying by his blood, and praying
for nothing more than what himself hath deserved and purchased. He that
is such a great High Priest, is excellently fitted in respect of this
office for the work of mediation.
B. The prophetical office of Christ is the
great, the only relief we have against the blindness and ignorance of
our minds.
He is that great Prophet of his church whom Moses foretold, the Jews
expected, and all men needed (Deut. 18:15; John 1:24, 25, 45; 6:14);
that Sun of Righteousness, who by his glorious beams dispels those mists
of ignorance and error which darken the minds of men; and is therefore
styled, by way of eminency, “that Light,” (Joh1:8) and “the true
Light” (John 1:9).
The execution of this prophetical office is
partly by revealing so much of the will of God as was necessary to our
salvation; partly by making those revelations powerful and effectual.
1. In revealing the will of God. For “no man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which
is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him” (John1:18). The
manner of revealing the mind of God hath been different in several ages.
a. Sometimes making use of instruments.
Who were either ordinary: as, under the law, the priests whose
lips should preserve knowledge (Mal. 2:7; 2Ch 15:3); and under the
gospel, pastors and teachers. Or else extraordinary: as prophets,
under the law and apostles and evangelists, in the first plantation of
the gospel. (Eph. 4:11-13).
b. For some time instructing his church
immediately in his own person. God, who at sundry times and in
divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, hath
in these last days spoken unto us by his Son (Heb. 1:1, 2).
2. In enlightening effectually the souls of
his people.
In causing the blind to see, and making them who were once darkness to
be “light in the Lord” (Eph. 5:8). Thus he instructs by his word and
by his Spirit, (1 Pet. 1:12) and, by that sovereignty he hath over the
hearts of men, opens their hearts to receive his counsels. He that can
thus speak, not only to the ear, but to the heart, is also in this
office excellently fitted for the work of mediation.
C. The kingly office of Christ is the great,
the only relief we have against our bondage to sin and Satan. He to whom “all power is given in heaven, and in earth” (Matt.
28:18). He whom God hath “raised from the dead, and set at his own
right hand in heavenly places, far above all principality, and power,
and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this
world, but also in that which is to come, and hath put all things under
his feet, and gave Him to be the Head over all things to the church”
(Eph. 1:20-22; Heb. 2:8; Phil. 2:9-11; 1 Cor. 15:27, 28); it is He that
restores “liberty to the captives,” and “opens the prison doors to
them that are bound” (Isa. 11:1).
This great office of a King he executes
chiefly in these royal acts:
1. In gathering to himself a people out of
all kindreds, nations, and tongues; (Gen 49:10; Isa. l5:4, 5) and in
making them a willing people in the day of his power. (Psa. 110:3).
2. In governing that people by laws,
officers, and censures of his own ordaining. (1 Cor. 3:28; 5:4, 5; Isa.
33:22; Eph. 4:11, 12; Matt. 18:17, 18).
3. In bringing all his elect into a state of
saving grace, and preserving that grace alive in their souls, which
himself hath wrought, though it be as a spark of fire in an ocean of
water; in carrying it on to perfection, and crowning it with glory. (1
Pet. 1:3-5; Eph. 4:12, 13; 1 Thess. 4:16, 17).
4. In restraining, over-ruling, and at last
destroying all his and his church's enemies. (Psa. 110:1). Those who
will not submit to the sceptre of his grace, he rules with his “iron
rod,” and will at last “dash them in pieces like a potter’s
vessel” (Psa. 2: 9).
And thus is Christ, not only in respect of
the dignity of his person, but the suitableness of his offices, the only
fit Mediator between God and man.
The doctrinal part of this scripture being
thus cleared, take one word by way of application.
USES.
USE 1: This may inform us of the unspeakable folly and misery of all
such as despise this Mediator.
There is but one Mediator, but one way of reconciliation unto
God, but one way of having sin pardoned, our natures cleansed, the
favour of God restored, our lost condition recovered, and that is
through the mediation of Christ; and shall it be said of any of us, as
Christ himself speaks of those foolishly obstinate Jews, they would not
come unto him that they might have life? (John 5:40) There is in Christ
the life of justification, to free us from that eternal death [which]
the law sentences us unto; the life of sanctification, to free us from
that spiritual death we are under by nature (Col. 3:4); there is in him
a sufficient relief against whatever is discouraging; and shall we be so
little our own friends, so false to our own concernments, as to reject
his proffered help, notwithstanding we do so highly need it?
A. In rejecting this Mediator, you sin
against the highest and greatest mercy that ever was vouchsafed14] to
creatures.
It is mentioned as an astonishing act of love in God, that He should
“so love the world, as to give his only-begotten Son, that whosoever
believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” (John
3:16) so, beyond all comparison, so, beyond all expression. And O, what
an amazing condescension was it in Christ, who, though he “thought it
not robbery to be equal with God,” was yet pleased to “make himself
of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made
in the likeness of men: and being found in fashion as a man, he humbled
himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross”
(Phil. 2: 6-8; John 15:13; compared with Rom 5:8) and all this as our
Mediator! There is not any mercy we enjoy, but it is the fruit of this
mercy.
B. You hereby read your condition. The same with Pagans; the emphasis of whose misery consists in this,
that they are without Christ and therefore without hope (Eph. 2:12).
Nay, the same with devils; who have no mediator interposing on their
behalf to God; but, as they sinned with a tempter, so they perish
without a Saviour. This is their misery; and shall this be any of our
choice?
C. Your condition is hereby rendered in this
respect worse than theirs, in that you despise that mercy which they
were never proffered.
The danger of this sin, you may find awakeningly set down by the
apostle. (Heb. 2: 3; 10:28- 30; 12:25).
USE 2: Be persuaded then to make use of
Christ in all his offices, in whom you have an universal antidote
against all discouragements.
Are your consciences alarmed with the
thunder of scripture-threats and curses of the law? Fly to that “blood
of sprinkling,” the voice whereof is much louder than the cry of your
sins (Heb. 12:24).
Are you stung with the sense of your
corruptions? Look up to Christ as your Brazen Serpent, that he may cure
these wounds, and deliver you from death. (John 3:14).
Are you discouraged from prayer, because
your prayers have hitherto been so sinfully defective? Consider the
intercession of Christ, and take encouragement from thence. (1 John 2:
1; Heb. 4:14, 16).
Are you afflicted with your own
unteachableness? Look up to him as the great Prophet sent of God, and
beg of him the inward and effectual teachings of his Spirit, that he
would speak as powerfully in his word to your dead hearts, as he once
spoke to dead Lazarus. (John 11:43).
Are you disquieted with doubts and fears, in
respect of your own perseverance? Though temptations are boisterous, and
corruptions violent, look up to him who sits at the right hand, till all
his enemies become his footstool, that he would strengthen you. (Psa.
110:1; Col. 1:11).
Are you full of fears because of Zion, the
afflictions, dangers, enemies of the church? Remember, he is the Head
over all things to the church. (Eph. 1:22).
In a word: whatever your afflictions or
troubles are, the mediation of Christ is a sufficient relief; and
therefore sit not down dejectedly mourning, like Hagar weeping at the
fountain-side (Gen. 21:16, 19).
|
|

Back to the
Christian Walk
|