The Regulative Principle of the Church
How should we worship God?
It may be helpful to read by John
Calvin on "The Necessity of Reforming the Church" before
going on to read the following articles on the Regulative Principle.
The Regulative
Principle in Worship: A brief article.
by Dr. C. Matthew McMahon
The Regulative Principle was given its
classical and definitive statement in the reformed Confessions
formulated in the 17th century. It is stated in Chapter 21 paragraph 1 in the Westminster
Confession:
The light of nature showeth that there is a God,
who hath lordship and sovereignty over all, is good, and doth good
unto all, and is therefore to be feared, loved, praised, called
upon, trusted in, and served, with all the heart, and with all the
soul, and with all the might.[1] But the acceptable way of
worshiping the true God is instituted by himself, and so limited by
his own revealed will, that he may not be worshiped according to the
imaginations and devices of men, or the suggestions of Satan, under
any visible representation, or any other way not prescribed in the
Holy Scripture.[2]
1. Rom. 1:20; Psa. 19:1-4a; 50:6; 86:8-10; 89:5-7; 95:1-6; 97:6;
104:1-35; 145:9-12; Acts 14:17; Deut. 6:4-5
2. Deut. 4:15-20; 12:32; Matt. 4:9-10; 15:9; Acts 17:23-25; Exod.
20:4-6, John 4:23-24; Col. 2:18-23
Simply the Regulative Principle States
this: True worship is only commanded by God; false worship is anything
not commanded. This was the Puritan’s view of worship. As Samuel
Waldron has said, "It seems that one of the major intellectual
stumbling blocks which hinders men from embracing the Regulative
Principle is that it involves the idea that the church and its worship
is ordered in a regulated way different from the rest of life. In the
rest of life God gives men the great precepts and general principles of
his word and within the bounds of these directions allows them to order
their lives as seems best to them. He does not give them minute
directions as to how they shall build their houses or pursue their
secular vocations. The Regulative principle, on the other hand, involves
a limitation on human initiative in freedom not characteristic of the
rest of life. It clearly assumes that there is a distinction between the
way the church and its worship is to be ordered and the way the rest of
human society and conduct is to be ordered. Thus, the Regulative
Principle is liable to strike many as oppressive, peculiar, and,
therefore, suspiciously out of accord with God’s dealings with mankind
and the rest of life." True enough.
It should be seen as appropriate at that
house of God be ordered by God’s rules. It should be seen as
appropriate that God’s people are to be ordered by God’s rules. It
should be seen as appropriate that worship, that which shows reverence,
piety, love, desire, and joy in God, be structured and ordered according
to God’s word and His biblical principles lying therein. Worship for
the Christian should be an expression of God’s heart back to God. We
ought to reflect back to God how wonderful and most blessed He is. It is
impossible to worship God by human invention. It is impossible to
worship God by human ingenuity. It is impossible to worship God in an
atmosphere that has not been structured and ordered by God and His word.
The Regulative Principle which is found in the Bible and expressed
clearly in its climactic expression by the Puritans should not be placed
by the way side because we and our contemporary culture are more
fascinated and captivated by being entertained rather than by
worshipping God.
The Presbyterian Puritans, in assembling
the Westminster standards, and the Reformed Baptist Puritans, in
assembling the 1689 London Baptist Confession, were both aiming at the
same thing: acceptable worship to Christ. Let us first look at the WCF and then we will look at the Biblical arguments which support
this statement of worship. The Confession first states, "The light
of Nature shews that there is a God, who hath Lordship, and Sovereignty
over all; is just, good, and doth good unto all; and is therefore to be
feared, loved, praised, called upon, trusted in, and served, with all
the Heart, and all the Soul, (a) and with all the Might." Here we
find the biblical and philosophical arguments for the existence of God
preceding the worship of that God which exists. The very light of
nature, if one was to argue through in his apologetics, would come to
the conclusion that there is a God. This God is the Sovereign Lord of
the universe. Not only does this statement say that God is sovereign,
but also that God is sovereign over all. He is the God who rules and who
reigns over every living thing, every creature, every rock, every atom,
anywhere in the entire universe. He is God over all. Because there is
such a God who is good, just, does good unto all, or at least may do
good unto all, he is therefore to be feared, loved, praised, called
upon, trusted in, and served with all the heart, might and soul. If this
God is holy, then there is a right and wrong way of approaching this
God. In God’s word Jesus Christ has given mankind not only the ability
to approach God but also all of the directives are by which we may
approach him. His atonement assures this to the elect. The confession
states that God is to be served, in essence, because he is God. So we
see that the Puritans could not begin by just stating how worship is to
be ordered and structured without first stating something about the God
who is to be worshipped.
The second part of the paragraph says
this, "But the acceptable way of worshipping the true God, is
instituted by himself; and so limited by his own revealed will, that he
may not be worshipped according to the imaginations, and devices of men,
or the suggestions of Satan, under any visible representations, or any
other way, not prescribed in the Holy Scriptures." The word
"acceptable" is used on purpose which intimates that there is
an unacceptable way of worshipping the true God. They chose their words
carefully stating that worshipping God is instituted by God himself. And
since, then, it is instituted by Himself, it is limited by what God has
revealed about Himself. Only those things which are found in the
Scriptures, which expressly state certain conditions of worship, are
acceptable worship to God. What man may make up, what he may devise,
what he may add, what he may take away, or what he may be tempted to do
by listening to the devil, is not acceptable. And the Puritans were sure
to state that the worship of God is not to be done by any visible
representations or any other way not prescribed in the Holy Scriptures.
Thus they were combating the idolatry of Catholicism with its images and
idols, and of any kind of will-worship. (We will see what will-worship
is in a moment.) Thus, from WCF, we see that the
Puritans were aiming at purity of worship; worship that was pleasing to
God, and worship that was taken completely from the Scriptures alone.
They could not in good conscience allow sinful men to dictate to God the
means by which sinful men may approach God. And it ought not to be that
any good Christian would think himself so above sin to be able to tell
God how he should approach God. God alone, being holy and pure, is able
in and of Himself, to dictate to human beings how they may approach Him.
There are four biblical arguments for the
Puritan Regulative principle of the church and its worship seen in the
WCF. First, 1) It is the prerogative of God alone to
determine the terms on which sinners may approach Him in worship. The principle that lies in the basis of the whole
argument is that in regard to the ordinance of public worship it
is the authority of God, and not the will of man, to determine both
the terms in a manner of such worshipped. The path of the approach to
God was shut and barred in consequence of man’s sin: it was impossible
for man to renew the which had been so solemnly closed by the Judicial
sentence which excluded him from the presence and favor of God. Could
that path ever again be opened up, and the communion of God with man and
of man with God ever again be renewed? This was a question of God alone
to determine. If it could, on what terms was the renewal of to take
place, and in what manner was the fellowship of the creature with its
creator again to be maintained? This, too, was a question no less than a
former for God alone to resolve. But not only is God just in His
prerogative, but the Bible shows that He exercises it as well. (Genesis
4:1-5; Exodus 20:4-6) Should God decree that He will be worshipped only
by those wearing white T-shirts, He would have the right to do so. If
God did decree that every Christian should wear a white T-shirt to
worship Him, I would imagine that all Christians, who truly love the
Lord, will go out and buy a whole bunch of white T-shirts so that they
never run out again. They would come to church wearing the white T-shirt
that God commanded they wear for worship. God is the one who commands
worship of us. What arrogance for man to think that he has the least
business in determining how God will be worshipped!
The second Puritan principle of the
regulative principle in worship is this, 2) The introduction of extra
Biblical practices into worship inevitably tends to nullify and
undermine God’s appointed worship. (Matthew 15:3,8,9; 2 Kings
16:10-18) 2 Kings 16:10-18 demonstrates that there is a way in which extra
biblical practices inevitably, but often with great subtlety, displaced
the appointed worship of God. King Ahaz in his apostasy
from God and alliance with Assyria set his heart on having another
alter like that which he saw in Damascus. He ordered the construction of
such an altar and that it should be placed in the central place occupied
by the old bronze altar. This altar displaced the old altar as the place
upon which the regular morning and evening offerings shall be offered;
but the old God appointed altar is, however, not destroyed. Of course
not! It is simply placed in a corner, verse 14. In a footnote to his
decree on this matter, King Ahaz assures his more traditional subjects
that no insult was intended to the old God appointed altar. That decree
concludes, "But the bronze altar shall be for me to acquire
by", verse 15. Human innovators pay lip service to the God
appointed elements of worship and simultaneously, in the very act,
nullify them. How strikingly this illustrates the subtlety with which
extra biblical practices have the tendency to displace the divine the
appointed altars of biblical worship! This tendency is illustrated in
evangelical churches today where mundane or silly announcements, special
music, testimony times, mime, puppet shows, liturgical dance and
Christian movies either completely replace or severely restrict the
ordained parts of worship. These or other traditions of men, for
instance, often leave only 20 minutes for preaching.
The third principle the Puritans drew
from the Scriptures is this, 3) That if sinful men were to add any
unappointed elements into worship, they would, by this action, be
calling into question the wisdom of Jesus Christ and the complete
sufficiency of the Scriptures alone. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 states this,
"all scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for
reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; that a man of
God may be adequate, equipped for every good work." The man of God
referred to in this text is not a reference to every individual
Christian. There are compelling reasons rather to identify "the man
of God any", as the man who like Timothy was charged to provide
order and leadership to the Church of God. The elders in a church are to
use the Scriptures in such a way to dictate what the order and structure
of worship is to be. It is not that the elders implement their own
worship, rather, by holding steadfastly to the word of God, they
implement what God states and desires for worship for the people of God.
The Scriptures then, are able to fully equip the man of God for every
good work in the Church of God, for the glory of God in worship.
Fourthly, The Puritans were very adamant
to prove that the Bible explicitly condemns all worship that is not
commanded by God. Scriptures proving this are the following: Leviticus
10:1-3; Deuteronomy 17:3; Deuteronomy 4:2; Deuteronomy 12:29-32; Joshua
1:7; 23:6-8; Matthew 15:8-13; Colossians 2:20-23. We will look Leviticus
10:1-3 and then two New Testament verses that are listed here both in
Matthew and Colossians.
Leviticus 10:1-3 states, "And Nadab
and Abihu, the sons of Aaron, took either of them his censer, and put
fire therein, and put incense thereon, and offered strange fire before
the LORD, which he commanded them not.
And there went out fire from the LORD,
and devoured them, and they died before the LORD. Then Moses said unto
Aaron, This is it that the LORD spake, saying, I will be
sanctified in them that come nigh me, and before all the people I will
be glorified. And Aaron held his peace." The text first shows us
that Nadab and Abihu came to offer incense to God. They offered incense
and God did not accept it. God was not pleased with what they offered.
The offered "strange fire". Now this is somewhat of an odd
statement. God never told them that they could not offer this strange
fire. You would look through the Scriptures in vain to find the
commandment which stated they were not allowed to do this. Rather, we do
find what God does tell them. Though God did not expressly forbid this
strange fire to be brought, we see from the text that God did not
approve of it, and killed them on the spot for offering it. Nadab and
Abihu took it upon themselves to offer to God something He did not
expressly ask for and God "smote" them for it. The principle
here does not die. God will be "sanctified" by those who draw
near to Him. That means He will be regarded as holy, utterly separated
by His people. God will receive His due glory whether it be in justice
upon Nadab and Abihu for offering strange fire, or by right worship.
They did not offer right worship and so were consumed. God desires right
worship. Nadab and Abihu’s sin was offering that which God did not
command. God never threatened to kill them if they offered strange fire,
but He killed them nonetheless. This would also show us that God’s
Word must be careful exegeted to find its proper meaning, least we
ourselves become the victims of His wrath. God is very picky about His
worship.
(This text has been masterfully exegeted
by Jeremiah Burroughs in his book "Gospel Worship". Burroughs
gives a number of expository sermons on these few verses numbering over
400 pages. The first sermon will be on this section of the web page
soon. An excellent treatment of these verses.)
The second Scripture to look at is
Matthew 15:8-9, "This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth,
and honoureth me with their lips; but their heart is far from me.
But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the
commandments of men." This is a very striking statement. Jesus
explains that the people, though they profess Him, really do not possess
Him because they do not truly worship Him. They honor Him with their
mouth by their testimony. They say they are Christians, they say they
love Him, they say many things. (And please note, that in this context
He is speaking about the Pharisees who seem to have their religion
neatly packaged "just for God".) But Jesus goes on to say that
their hearts are not near Him. Their hearts are somewhere else. They do
not belong to Christ. They do not really worship Christ. Rather, they
add things to God’s worship and thus teach as "doctrines"
(or Gospel truths) the vain imaginations of men. The commandments which
men make up (like additions to worship) are condemned here because they
do not truly honor Christ. Man is not given the right to create the
ambience of worshipping and drawing near to God. Jesus condemns any
creation of this on the part of man.
The third Scripture to examine is
Colossians 2:20-23, "Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the
rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye
subject to ordinances, (Touch not; taste not; handle not; Which all are
to perish with the using;) after the commandments and doctrines of men?
Which things have indeed a shew of wisdom in will worship, and humility,
and neglecting of the body; not in any honour to the satisfying of the
flesh." Here Paul is refuting the false worship which men may
impose on others. Worship not rightly divided from the word of God is
called "will-worship". It is, in essence, a worship of the
self, because it is a worship from the self and what the
"self" likes. Will-worship is when the human factor is the
agent by which worship is dictated. Often, this is when the pew dictates
to the pulpit what is preached, and how the worship is structured.
Oftentimes churches cater to the world and create an atmosphere
"unthreatening" to the world so they fill up the church.
Unfortunately, the church then becomes like the world, instead of the
conversion of souls to make the world the church. Worship then becomes a
matter of taste, and convenience. Human desire becomes the deciding
factor. Imagine if Nadab and Abihu were allowed to come and visit the
contemporary church—they would fall to the ground and weep bitterly
knowing that their sin is still carried on today with acceptance.
The Puritans desired simple, biblical
worship. They regulated their worship by the Bible instead of their own
"wills". They had no desire to offer strange fire no matter
how "exciting" the strange fire would be to the spectators.
They were not interested in putting on a show. When Elijah was on Mt.
Carmel in 1 Kings 18, he asked the people if they were ready to follow
God or Baal. When posed with the question, the people were silent. When
Elijah said he wanted to have a "contest" with the priests (a
"show"), what did the people do? They were all excited about
it. "Yes! Let’s have a show!" And so they did. The
"contemporary church" is the same today. They want a show.
They want fire to fall from heaven. They want the spectacular, or at
least as entertaining as "church may be". But God is
displeased. And if it were not for the grace of God, most
"churches" today would be consumed as Nadab and Abihu were.
May the God of worship open the eyes of
the blind that they may see. |
|

Back to
Puritan Worship
|