The 95 Theses
The spark of the Reformation where
Luther nailed his 95 Theses to the door of the Wittenberg church in
order for all the priests to see his propositions on the Roman Catholic
Holiday of All Saint's Day, November 1, 1517.
One would imagine that a cornerstone
document for the new "Reformation" would be thoroughly evangelical and
orthodox. Consider, though, Luther's ideal that he desired the
Roman Catholic Church to repent of its wickedness and be reformed - not
to break off from the church and continue it apart from the "holy
father." Luther's 95 Theses proves that God can use a recently
converted Catholic Monk if He so chooses, even if his theology is not
quite up to par as the stalwart "Reformed Christian" would like. In this list you will
find a few soothing words, but far more strange and unorthodox doctrine
than one would care to admit. The story of the
Reformation and
Martin Luther are more attractive than this early document. But
take it for what it is worth - an incredible iron pen against the Roman
Church of the time. It certainly sparked the Reformation to come
to full light and began the sequence of events that lead the church to
continue under the light of the Gospel, instead under the darkness of
superstition.
THE 95 THESES
by Dr. Martin Luther
1. When our Lord and Master Jesus Christ
said, “Repent” (Matthew 4:17), he willed the entire life of believers to
be one of repentance.
2. This word cannot be understood as
referring to the sacrament of penance, that is, confession and
satisfaction, as administered by the clergy.
3. Yet it does not mean solely inner
repentance; such inner repentance is worthless unless it produces
various outward mortification of the flesh.
4. The penalty of sin remains as long as the
hatred of self (that is, true inner repentance), namely till our
entrance into the kingdom of heaven.
5. The pope neither desires nor is able to
remit any penalties except those imposed by his own authority or that of
the canons.
6. The pope cannot remit any guilt, except
by declaring and showing that it has been remitted by God; or, to be
sure, by remitting guilt in cases reserved to his judgment. If his right
to grant remission in these cases were disregarded, the guilt would
certainly remain unforgiven.
7. God remits guilt to no one unless at the
same time he humbles him in all things and makes him submissive to the
vicar, the priest.
8. The penitential canons are imposed only
on the living, and, according to the canons themselves, nothing should
be imposed on the dying.
9. Therefore the Holy Spirit through the
pope is kind to us insofar as the pope in his decrees always makes
exception of the article of death and of necessity.
10. Those priests act ignorantly and
wickedly who, in the case of the dying, reserve canonical penalties for
purgatory.
11. Those tares of changing the canonical
penalty to the penalty of purgatory were evidently sown while the
bishops slept. Matthew 13:25
12. In former times canonical penalties were
imposed, not after, but before absolution, as tests of true contrition.
13. The dying are freed by death from all
penalties, are already dead as far as the canon laws are concerned, and
have a right to be released from them.
14. Imperfect piety or love on the part of
the dying person necessarily brings with it great fear; and the smaller
the love, the greater the fear.
15. This fear or horror is sufficient in
itself, to say nothing of other things, to constitute the penalty of
purgatory, since it is very near to the horror of despair.
16. Hell, purgatory, and heaven seem to
differ the same as despair, fear, and assurance of salvation.
17. It seems as though for the souls in
purgatory fear should necessarily decrease and love increase.
18. Furthermore, it does not seem proved,
either by reason or by Scripture, that souls in purgatory are outside
the state of merit, that is, unable to grow in love.
19. Nor does it seem proved that souls in
purgatory, at least not all of them, are certain and assured of their
own salvation, even if we ourselves may be entirely certain of it.
20. Therefore the pope, when he uses the
words “plenary remission of all penalties,” does not actually mean “all
penalties,” but only those imposed by himself.
21. Thus those indulgence preachers are in
error who say that a man is absolved from every penalty and saved by
papal indulgences.
22. As a matter of fact, the pope remits to
souls in purgatory no penalty which, according to canon law, they should
have paid in this life.
23. If remission of all penalties whatsoever
could be granted to anyone at all, certainly it would be granted only to
the most perfect, that is, to very few.
24. For this reason most people are
necessarily deceived by that indiscriminate and high-sounding promise of
release from penalty.
25. That power which the pope has in general
over purgatory corresponds to the power which any bishop or curate has
in a particular way in his own diocese and parish.
26. The pope does very well when he grants
remission to souls in purgatory, not by the power of the keys, which he
does not have, but by way of intercession for them.
27. They preach only human doctrines who say
that as soon as the money clinks into the money chest, the soul flies
out of purgatory.
28. It is certain that when money clinks in
the money chest, greed and avarice can be increased; but when the church
intercedes, the result is in the hands of God alone.
29. Who knows whether all souls in purgatory
wish to be redeemed, since we have exceptions in St. Severinus and St.
Paschal, as related in a legend.
30. No one is sure of the integrity of his
own contrition, much less of having received plenary remission.
31. The man who actually buys indulgences is
as rare as he who is really penitent; indeed, he is exceedingly rare.
32. Those who believe that they can be
certain of their salvation because they have indulgence letters will be
eternally damned, together with their teachers.
33. Men must especially be on guard against
those who say that the pope's pardons are that inestimable gift of God
by which man is reconciled to him.
34. For the graces of indulgences are
concerned only with the penalties of sacramental satisfaction
established by man.
35. They who teach that contrition is not
necessary on the part of those who intend to buy souls out of purgatory
or to buy confessional privileges preach unchristian doctrine.
36. Any truly repentant Christian has a
right to full remission of penalty and guilt, even without indulgence
letters.
37. Any true Christian, whether living or
dead, participates in all the blessings of Christ and the church; and
this is granted him by God, even without indulgence letters.
38. Nevertheless, papal remission and
blessing are by no means to be disregarded, for they are, as I have said
(Thesis 6), the proclamation of the divine remission.
39. It is very difficult, even for the most
learned theologians, at one and the same time to commend to the people
the bounty of indulgences and the need of true contrition.
40. A Christian who is truly contrite seeks
and loves to pay penalties for his sins; the bounty of indulgences,
however, relaxes penalties and causes men to hate them -- at least it
furnishes occasion for hating them.
41. Papal indulgences must be preached with
caution, lest people erroneously think that they are preferable to other
good works of love.
42. Christians are to be taught that the
pope does not intend that the buying of indulgences should in any way be
compared with works of mercy.
43. Christians are to be taught that he who
gives to the poor or lends to the needy does a better deed than he who
buys indulgences.
44. Because love grows by works of love, man
thereby becomes better. Man does not, however, become better by means of
indulgences but is merely freed from penalties.
45. Christians are to be taught that he who
sees a needy man and passes him by, yet gives his money for indulgences,
does not buy papal indulgences but God's wrath.
46. Christians are to be taught that, unless
they have more than they need, they must reserve enough for their family
needs and by no means squander it on indulgences.
47. Christians are to be taught that they
buying of indulgences is a matter of free choice, not commanded.
48 Christians are to be taught that the
pope, in granting indulgences, needs and thus desires their devout
prayer more than their money.
49. Christians are to be taught that papal
indulgences are useful only if they do not put their trust in them, but
very harmful if they lose their fear of God because of them.
50. Christians are to be taught that if the
pope knew the exactions of the indulgence preachers, he would rather
that the basilica of St. Peter were burned to ashes than built up with
the skin, flesh, and bones of his sheep.
51. Christians are to be taught that the
pope would and should wish to give of his own money, even though he had
to sell the basilica of St. Peter, to many of those from whom certain
hawkers of indulgences cajole money.
52. It is vain to trust in salvation by
indulgence letters, even though the indulgence commissary, or even the
pope, were to offer his soul as security.
53. They are the enemies of Christ and the
pope who forbid altogether the preaching of the Word of God in some
churches in order that indulgences may be preached in others.
54. Injury is done to the Word of God when,
in the same sermon, an equal or larger amount of time is devoted to
indulgences than to the Word.
55. It is certainly the pope's sentiment
that if indulgences, which are a very insignificant thing, are
celebrated with one bell, one procession, and one ceremony, then the
gospel, which is the very greatest thing, should be preached with a
hundred bells, a hundred processions, a hundred ceremonies.
56. The true treasures of the church, out of
which the pope distributes indulgences, are not sufficiently discussed
or known among the people of Christ.
57. That indulgences are not temporal
treasures is certainly clear, for many indulgence sellers do not
distribute them freely but only gather them.
58. Nor are they the merits of Christ and
the saints, for, even without the pope, the latter always work grace for
the inner man, and the cross, death, and hell for the outer man.
59. St. Lawrence said that the poor of the
church were the treasures of the church, but he spoke according to the
usage of the word in his own time.
60. Without want of consideration we say
that the keys of the church, given by the merits of Christ, are that
treasure.
61. For it is clear that the pope's power is
of itself sufficient for the remission of penalties and cases reserved
by himself.
62. The true treasure of the church is the
most holy gospel of the glory and grace of God.
63. But this treasure is naturally most
odious, for it makes the first to be last. Matthew 20:16.
64. On the other hand, the treasure of
indulgences is naturally most acceptable, for it makes the last to be
first.
65. Therefore the treasures of the gospel
are nets with which one formerly fished for men of wealth.
66. The treasures of indulgences are nets
with which one now fishes for the wealth of men.
67. The indulgences which the demagogues
acclaim as the greatest graces are actually understood to be such only
insofar as they promote gain.
68. They are nevertheless in truth the most
insignificant graces when compared with the grace of God and the piety
of the cross.
69. Bishops and curates are bound to admit
the commissaries of papal indulgences with all reverence.
70. But they are much more bound to strain
their eyes and ears lest these men preach their own dreams instead of
what the pope has commissioned.
71. Let him who speaks against the truth
concerning papal indulgences be anathema and accursed.
72. But let him who guards against the lust
and license of the indulgence preachers be blessed.
73. Just as the pope justly thunders against
those who by any means whatever contrive harm to the sale of
indulgences.
74. Much more does he intend to thunder
against those who use indulgences as a pretext to contrive harm to holy
love and truth.
75. To consider papal indulgences so great
that they could absolve a man even if he had done the impossible and had
violated the mother of God is madness.
76. We say on the contrary that papal
indulgences cannot remove the very least of venial sins as far as guilt
is concerned.
77. To say that even St. Peter if he were
now pope, could not grant greater graces is blasphemy against St. Peter
and the pope.
78. We say on the contrary that even the
present pope, or any pope whatsoever, has greater graces at his
disposal, that is, the gospel, spiritual powers, gifts of healing, etc.,
as it is written. I Corinthians 12:28.
79. To say that the cross emblazoned with
the papal coat of arms, and set up by the indulgence preachers is equal
in worth to the cross of Christ is blasphemy.
80. The bishops, curates, and theologians
who permit such talk to be spread among the people will have to answer
for this.
81. This unbridled preaching of indulgences
makes it difficult even for learned men to rescue the reverence which is
due the pope from slander or from the shrewd questions of the laity.
82. Such as: “Why does not the pope empty
purgatory for the sake of holy love and the dire need of the souls that
are there if he redeems an infinite number of souls for the sake of
miserable money with which to build a church? The former reason would be
most just; the latter is most trivial.
83. Again, “Why are funeral and anniversary
masses for the dead continued and why does he not return or permit the
withdrawal of the endowments founded for them, since it is wrong to pray
for the redeemed?”
84. Again, “What is this new piety of God
and the pope that for a consideration of money they permit a man who is
impious and their enemy to buy out of purgatory the pious soul of a
friend of God and do not rather, because of the need of that pious and
beloved soul, free it for pure love's sake?”
85. Again, “Why are the penitential canons,
long since abrogated and dead in actual fact and through disuse, now
satisfied by the granting of indulgences as though they were still alive
and in force?”
86. Again, “Why does not the pope, whose
wealth is today greater than the wealth of the richest Crassus, build
this one basilica of St. Peter with his own money rather than with the
money of poor believers?”
87. Again, “What does the pope remit or
grant to those who by perfect contrition already have a right to full
remission and blessings?”
88. Again, “What greater blessing could come
to the church than if the pope were to bestow these remissions and
blessings on every believer a hundred times a day, as he now does but
once?”
89. “Since the pope seeks the salvation of
souls rather than money by his indulgences, why does he suspend the
indulgences and pardons previously granted when they have equal
efficacy?”
90. To repress these very sharp arguments of
the laity by force alone, and not to resolve them by giving reasons, is
to expose the church and the pope to the ridicule of their enemies and
to make Christians unhappy.
91. If, therefore, indulgences were preached
according to the spirit and intention of the pope, all these doubts
would be readily resolved. Indeed, they would not exist.
92. Away, then, with all those prophets who
say to the people of Christ, “Peace, peace,” and there is no peace!
Jeremiah 6:14
93. Blessed be all those prophets who say to
the people of Christ, “Cross, cross,” and there is no cross!
94. Christians should be exhorted to be
diligent in following Christ, their Head, through penalties, death and
hell.
95. And thus be confident of entering into
heaven through many tribulations rather than through the false security
of peace. Acts 14:22
|