John Preston, D.D. (1587–1628)One of the most popular Calvinistic puritans, and a fiery preacher.
Today, many Christians are turning back to the puritans to, “walk in the old paths,” of God’s word, and to continue to proclaim old truth that glorifies Jesus Christ. There is no new theology. In our electronic age, more and more people are looking to add electronic books (ePubs, mobi and PDF formats) to their library – books from the Reformers and Puritans – in order to become a “digital puritan” themselves. Take a moment to visit Puritan Publications (click the banner below) to find the biggest selection of rare puritan works updated in modern English in both print form and in multiple electronic forms. There are new books published every month. All proceeds go to support A Puritan’s Mind.
“Look on your own secret sins, your relapses, and then on Christ’s coming with his mercies and favors, and you cannot but love him.”
A Heavenly Treatise on the Divine Love of Christ by John Preston – eBook
Buy the Print Book HERE
The Irresistibleness of Converting Grace by John Preston – eBook
The Works of John Preston available in old English (Puritan Publications is working to publish many of John Preston’s works):
His works are:
1. “The Saints Daily Exercise; or a … Treatise of Prayer,” etc., 3rd edit. 1629, 4to (on 1 Thess. v. 17).
2. “The New Covenant … 14 Sermons on Genesis, 17:1, 2,” etc., 1629, 4to.
3. “Four Sermons,” etc., 1630, 4to (on Eccles. 9:1, 2, 11, 12).
4. “Five Sermons … before his Majestie,” etc., 1630, 4to (on 1 John 5:15; Isaiah, 64:4; Eph. 5:15; 1 Tim. 3:15; 1 Sam. 12:20–22).
5. “The Breastplate of Faith and Love,” etc. 1630, 4to (eighteen sermons, on Rev. 1:17; 1 Thess. 1:3; Gal. 5:6).
6. “The Doctrine of the Saints Infirmities,” etc., Amsterdam [1630?], 12mo (on 2 Chron. 20:18–20).
7. “Life Eternal; or a…Treatise…of the Divine…Attributes in 17 Sermons,” etc. 1631, 4to.
8. “The Law Out Lawed,” etc. Edinburgh, 1631, 4to (on Rom. vi. 14).
9. “An Elegant … Description of Spiritual Life and Death,” etc., 1632, 4to.
10. “The Deformed Form of a Formal Profession,” etc., Edinburgh, 1632, 4to (on 2 Tim. 3:5); London, 1641, 4to.
11. “Sins Overthrow; or a…Treatise of Mortification,” etc., 2nd edit. 1633, 4to (on Col. 3:5).
12. “Four…Treatises,” etc. 1633, 4to (includes 1. “A Remedy against Covetousnes,” on Col. 3:5; 2. “An Elegant and Lively Description of Spiritual Life and Death,” on John 5:25; 3. “The Doctrine of Self-denial,” on Luke 9:23, preached at Lincoln’s Inn; 4. “Three Sermons upon the Sacrament,” on 1 John 5:14).
13. “The Saints Qualification,” etc., 3rd edit. 1634, 4to (ten sermons on Humiliation, nine of them on Rom. 1:18, the tenth preached before the House of Commons on Num. 25:10, 11; nine sermons on Sanctification, on 1 Cor. 5:17; three on communion with Christ in the Sacrament, on 1 Cor. 10:16).
14. “A Liveles Life; or Man’s Spiritual Death,” etc., 3rd edit. 1635, 4to (on Eph. 2:1–3).
15. “A Sermon preached at Lincolnes-Inne,” etc., 1635, 4to (on Gen. 22:14).
16. “Remains of … John Preston,” 2nd edit. 1637, 4to (includes 1. “Judas his Repentance,” on Matt. 27:3–5; 2. “The Saints Spiritual Strength,” on Eph. 3:16; 3. “Paul’s Conversion,” on Acts 9:6).
17. “The Golden Scepter…Three Treatises,” etc., 1638, 4to.
18. “Mount Ebal…Treatise of the Divine Love,” etc., 1638, 4to (five sermons on 1 Cor. 16:22).
19. “The Saints Submission,” etc., 1638, 12mo.
20. “The Fullness of Christ,” etc., 1640, 4to (on John 1:16).
21. “The Christian Freedom,” etc. 1641, 4to (on Rom. 6:14).
22. “De Irresistibilitate Gratiæ Convertentis. Thesis habita in Scholis Publicis Academiæ Cantabrigiensis … Ex ipsius manuscripto,” etc. 1643, 16mo; in English, “The Position of John Preston…Concerning the Irresistiblenesse of Converting Grace,” etc. 1654, 4to.
23. “Riches of Mercy,” etc., 1658, 4to.
24. “Prayers,” etc., 24mo; this last is in the list of works prefixed to “The Position.” An “Abridgment” of six of Preston’s works by William Jemmat was published in 1648, 12mo. With his sermons are sometimes erroneously catalogued some funeral sermons (1615–19) by John Preston, vicar of East Ogwell, Devonshire.
Biography of John Preston, D.D. (1587–1628):
John Preston, D.D. (1587–1628), puritan divine, son of Thomas Preston, a farmer, was born at Upper Heyford in the parish of Bugbrook, Northamptonshire, and was baptized at Bugbrook church on October 27, 1587. His mother’s maiden name was Alice Marsh. Her maternal uncle, Creswell, was mayor of Northampton. Being rich and childless, he adopted Preston, placing him at the Northampton grammar school, and subsequently with a Bedfordshire clergyman named Guest for instruction in Greek. He matriculated as a sizar at King’s College, Cambridge, on July 5, 1604, his tutor being Busse, who became master of Eton in 1606. King’s College was then famous for the study of music; Preston chose “the noblest but hardest instrument, the lute,” but made little progress. In 1606 he migrated to Queens” College, where he had as tutor Oliver Bowles, B.D. Creswell had left him the reversion of some landed property, and he thought of a diplomatic career. With this view he entered into treaty with a merchant, who arranged for his spending some time in Paris, but on this merchant’s death the arrangement fell through. Preston then turned to the study of philosophy, in which he was encouraged by Porter, who succeeded Bowles as his tutor. By Porter’s interest with Tyndal, master of Queens” and dean of Ely, Preston, who had graduated B.A. in 1607, was chosen fellow in 1609. From philosophy he now turned to medicine; got some practical knowledge under the roof of a friend, a physician in Kent, “very famous for his practice;” and studied astrology, then valued as a handmaid to therapeutics.
About 1611, the year in which he commenced to gain an M.A., he heard a sermon at St. Mary’s from John Cotton (1585–1652), then fellow of Emmanuel, which opened to him a new career. Cotton had a great reputation as an elegant preacher; but this was a plain evangelical sermon, and “disappointed” his audience. He returned to his rooms, somewhat mortified by his reception, when Preston knocked at his door, and that close religious friendship began which permanently influenced the lives of both. Preston now gave himself to the study of scholastic divinity; Aquinas seems to have been his favorite; he thoroughly mastered also Duns Scotus and Ockham. The Lord, who designed him to fill an important office in his church, was pleased to frustrate his aspiring thoughts of philsophy. The word of God made so deep an impression on his mind, as at once cured him of thirsting after preferment. From this time he became remarkable for true christian piety; and though he had here despised the ministerial work as beneath his notice, he now directed all his studies with a view to that sacred employment.
His biographer tells a curious story of his activity in securing the election (1614) of John Davenant as master of Queens’ in succession to Tyndal. George Montaigne, afterwards archbishop of York, had his eye on this preferment; but immediately on Tyndal’s death Preston rode post-haste to London, reaching Whitehall before daybreak. Here he made interest with Robert Carr, earl of Somerset, with a view to secure court sanction for the choice of Davenant. Returning to Cambridge, he had the election over before Montaigne got wind of the vacancy.
During the visit of James I to Cambridge in March 1615, Preston distinguished himself as a disputant. He was chosen by Samuel Harsnett, the vice-chancellor, as “answerer” in the philosophy act, but this place was successfully claimed by Matthew Wren (1585–1667), and Preston took the post of “first opponent.” His biographer, Thomas Ball, gives an amusing account of the disputation on the question “Whether dogs could make syllogismes.” Preston maintained that they could. James was delighted with his argument (which Granger thinks Preston borrowed from a well-known passage in Montaigne’s “Essays”), and introduced a dog story of his own. “It was easy to discerne that ye kings hound had opened a way for Mr. Preston at ye court.” Sir Fulke Greville, first lord Brooke, became his firm friend (he ultimately settled 50l. a year upon him). But Preston had by this time given up his early ambition; though he said little of his purpose, his mind was set on the ministry, and he was reading modern divinity, especially Calvin.
His coolness in the direction of court favor gave rise to suspicions of his puritan leaning. These were increased by an incident of James’s second visit to Cambridge. A comedy called “Ignoramus,” by George Ruggle of Clare Hall, was to be acted before the king. Preston’s pupil Morgan (of the Morgans of Heyford) was cast for a woman’s part. Preston objected; the lad’s guardians overruled the objection; Morgan, who was removed to Oxford, subsequently joined the Roman catholic church. His strictness greatly increased his reputation as a tutor with puritan parents; “he was,” says Fuller, “the greatest pulpit-monger in England in man’s memory…every time, when Master Preston plucked off his hat to Doctor Davenant, the college master, he gained a chamber or study for one of his pupils.” The college buildings were enlarged to provide for the influx of students. He was in the habit of sending those designed for the church to finish their studies with Cotton, now vicar of Boston, Lincolnshire. Meanwhile, Preston’s health was suffering, and he was troubled with insomnia. Twice he applied for advice (once in disguise) to William Butler (1535–1618) of Clare Hall, a successful empiric. Butler only told him to take tobacco; on doing so he found his remedy in “this hot copious fume.”
Dr. Preston was a divine of extraordinary abilities and learning, and, about this time, deeply engaged in public controversy with several learned Arminians. He was called to take a leading part in two public disputations, procured by the Earl of Warwick, and held at York-house, in the presence of the Duke of Buckingham and others of the nobility. The first of these contests was betwixt Bishop Buckridge and Dr. White, dean of Carlisle, on the one part; and Bishop Morton and Dr. Preston, on the other. In the conclusion, the Earl of Pembroke observed, “that no person returned from this learned disputation of Arminian sentiments, who was not an Arminian before he came.” The second conference was betwixt Dr. White and Mr. Montague, on the one part; and Bishop Morton and Dr. Preston, on the other. On this occasion, Preston is said to have displayed his uncommon erudition and powers of disputation, to the great advantage of the cause which he undertook to support.
Preston had now taken orders, and become dean and catechist of Queens’. He began a course of sermons which were to form a body of divinity. Complaints were made to the vice-chancellor that the college chapel was crowded with scholars from other colleges and townsmen. Order was issued excluding all but members of the college. Preston then began an afternoon lecture at St. Botolph’s, of which Queens” College is patron. This brought him into conflict with Newcome, commissary to the chancellor of Ely, whose enmity Preston had earned by preventing a match between his pupil, Sir Capel Bedels, and Newcome’s daughter Jane. A dispute with Newcome at St. Botolph’s delayed the afternoon service; to make room for the sermon, common prayer was for once omitted. Newcome sped to the court at Newmarket to denounce Preston as a nonconformist. The matter came before the heads of houses, and there was talk of Preston’s expulsion from the university. At the suggestion of Lancelot Andrewes, then bishop of Ely, Preston was directed to declare his judgment regarding forms of prayer in a sermon at St. Botolph’s. He acquitted himself so as to silence complaint. Soon afterwards he was summoned to preach before the king at Finchingbrook, near Royston, Cambridgeshire. James highly approved his argument against the Arminians; he would have shown him less favor had he known that Preston was the author of a paper against the Spanish match, circulated with much secrecy among members of the House of Lords. He was proposed as a royal chaplain by James Hamilton, second marquis of Hamilton, but James thought this premature.
Preston’s kinsman, Sir Ralph Freeman, who had married a relative of George Villiers, first duke of Buckingham, now took occasion to represent to Buckingham that he might make friends of the puritans by promoting Preston. Through Buckingham’s interest he was made chaplain-in-ordinary to Prince Charles. He took the degree of B.D. in 1620. On Davenant’s election (June 11, 1621) to the see of Salisbury, Preston had some expectation of succeeding him as Margaret professor of divinity. He felt his Latin to be rusty, and, as an exercise in speaking Latin, he resolved on a visit to the Dutch universities, a project which he carried out with a singular excess of precaution. From the privy council he obtained the necessary license for travel. He gave out that he was going, the next vacation, to visit Sir Richard Sandys in Kent, and possibly to drink the Tunbridge waters. From the Kentish coast he took boat for Rotterdam, in a lay habit with “scarlet cloake” and “gold hat band.” In Holland he consorted with Roman Catholics as well as protestants. On his return to Cambridge he met the rumor of his having been beyond the seas with a wonder “at their sillyness, that they would believe so unlikely a relation.” After all he had been outwitted, for Williams, the lord keeper, suspecting some puritan plot, had set a spy on his movements, who sent weekly intelligence of his doings.
In February 1622 John Donne (1573–1631) resigned the preachership at Lincoln’s Inn, and the benchers elected Preston as his successor. A new chapel, finished soon after his appointment, gave accommodation to the large numbers who flocked to hear him. A more important piece of preferment followed, but it was not obtained without intrigue. Laurence Chaderton, the first master of Emmanuel, had held that post with distinction for thirty-eight years. He had outlived his influential friends, and the fellows thought that to secure Preston’s interest with Buckingham would be to the advantage of their college. In particular they wanted a modification of the statutes, which enjoined continuous residence, so cutting them off from chaplaincies and lectureships, and at the same time compelled them to vacate at the standing of D.D., whether otherwise provided or not. From Preston’s influence they hoped to gain more liberty, as well as to increase the number of college livings. Chaderton thought highly of Preston, but was very reluctant to resign, and doubted whether, if he did, an Arminian might not be appointed. Preston procured a letter from Buckingham (Sept. 20, 1622) assuring Chaderton that it was the wish of the king and the prince that he should make way for Preston, and promising him a “supply of maintenance.” Accordingly Chaderton resigned on Sept. 25; contrary to statute, the vacancy was not announced, on the plea that all the fellows were in residence; the election took place on Oct. 2 with locked gates, and nothing was known of it at Queens’ until Preston was sent for to be admitted as master of Emmanuel. The statutes limited the master’s absence to a month in every quarter. This would interfere with Preston’s preaching at Lincoln’s Inn. His ingenuity found out evasions to which the fellows consented; the statutes condoned absence in case of “violent detention” and of “college business;” a “moral violence” was held to satisfy the former condition, and a suit at law about a college living, which lasted some years, formed a colourable pretext for alleging college business. But Preston was inflexible on the point of vacating fellowships. In 1623 he was made D.D. by royal mandate. According to Ball, he had been selected by Buckingham to accompany Arthur Chichester, lord Chichester, on a projected embassy to Germany, and was, on this occasion, made D.D. There is probably some confusion here: Chichester’s actual expedition to the palatinate was in May-September 1622.
Preston was anxious for opportunities of preaching at Cambridge, and listened to proposals in 1624 for putting him into a vacant lectureship at Trinity Church. The other candidate, Middlethwait, fellow of Sidney Sussex, was favored by Nicholas Felton, bishop of Ely. The matter was referred to James I, who wanted to keep Preston out of a Cambridge pulpit, and, through Edward Conway (afterwards Viscount Conway), offered him any other preferment at his choice. It was then that Buckingham told Preston he might have the bishopric of Gloucester, vacant by the death of Miles Smith (d. Oct. 20, 1624). But Preston, backed by the townsmen, maintained his ground and got the lectureship.
He was in attendance as Charles’s chaplain at Theobalds on Sunday, March 27, 1625, when James I died, and accompanied Charles and Buckingham to Whitehall, where the public proclamation of Charles’s accession was made. For the moment it seemed as if Preston was destined to play an important part in politics. He exerted influence on behalf of his puritan friends, obtaining a general preaching license (June 20, 1625) for Arthur Hildersam. But he found his plans counteracted by Laud. On the plea of a danger of the plague, he closed his college and took a journey into the west. He wanted to consult Davenant at Salisbury about the “Appello Cæsarem” of Richard Montagu or Mountague, on which Buckingham had asked his judgment. From Salisbury he went on to Dorchester, and thence to Plymouth, where Charles and Buckingham were. When the news reached Plymouth of the disaster at Rochelle (Sept. 16, 1625), Preston did his best to excuse and defend Buckingham against the outburst of protestant indignation. On the removal of Williams from the lord-keepership (Oct. 30, 1625), Buckingham “went so farr as to nominate” Preston to be lord keeper. Thomas Coventry, lord Coventry, who had been counsel for Emmanuel College in the suit above mentioned, was eventually appointed.
Preston, however, could not draw the puritans to the side of Buckingham, whom they profoundly distrusted. Preston’s friends urged the necessity of a conference on Montagu’s books, and nominated on the one side John Buckeridge, bishop of Rochester, and Francis White, then dean of Carlisle; on the other, Thomas Morton (1564–1659), then bishop of Coventry and Lichfield, and Preston. Buckingham played a double part, begging Preston as his friend to decline the conference, and letting others know that he had done with Preston. The conference was held in February 1626 at York House. Preston refused to take part, but came in after it was begun and sat by as a hearer. A second conference followed in the same month, at which Preston took the lead against Montagu and White.
Buckingham was elected chancellor of Cambridge University on June 1, 1626. Preston did not oppose his election, as Joseph Mead and others did; but he now felt his position in the university insecure, looked to Lincoln’s Inn as a refuge in case he were ousted from Cambridge, and as a last resort contemplated a migration to Basle. A private letter to a member of parliament, in which Preston suggested a line of opposition to Buckingham, came by an accident into Buckingham’s hands. Seeing that Preston’s influence at court was waning, the fellows of Emmanuel petitioned the king to annul the statute limiting the tenure of their fellowships. Buckingham supported their plea. Preston had the support of Sir Henry Mildmay, the founder’s grandson. At length a compromise was reached. Charles suspended the statute (May 5, 1627) till such time as six new livings of 100£ a year should be annexed to the college. Buckingham was now engaged with his ill-fated expedition (June 27, 1627) to the Isle of Ré. In November Preston preached before Charles at Whitehall a sermon which was regarded as prophetic when, on the following Wednesday, news arrived of Buckingham’s defeat (Nov.). He was not allowed to preach again, but considered that he had obtained a moral victory for his cause.
Dr. Preston possessed a strong constitution, which he wore out by hard study and constant preaching. His inquiry was not, “How long have I lived?” but, “how have I lived?” Desiring, in his last sickness, to die among his old friends, he retired to Preston, near Heyford, in his native county; and having revised his will, and settled all his worldly affairs, he committed himself to the wise and gracious disposal of his heavenly Father. As he felt the symptoms of death coming upon him, he said, “I shall not change my company; for I shall still converse with God and saints.” A few hours previous to his departure, being told it was the Lord’s day, he said, “A fit day to be sacrificed on! I have accompanied saints on earth: now I shall accompany angels in heaven. My dissolution is at hand. Let me go to my home, and to Jesus Christ, who hath bought me with his precious blood.” He afterwards added, “I feel death coming to my heart. My pain shall now be turned into joy,” and then gave up the ghost, in the month of July, 1628, being only forty-one years of age. His remains were interred in Fausley church, when the venerable Mr. Dod preached his funeral sermon to an immense crowd of people. Fuller, who has classed him among the learned writers of Queen’s college, Cambridge, says, “ he was all judgment and gravity, and the perfect master of his passions, an excellent preacher, a celebrated disputant, and a perfect politician.”
A fine engraved portrait of him is prefixed to his “New Covenant,” 1629; it is poorly reproduced in Clarke; there are also two smaller engravings. As Ball describes him, “he was of an able, firme, well-tempered constitution, comely visadge, vigorous and vived eye.” He was unmarried. His will provided for his mother and brothers, founded exhibitions at Emmanuel College, and left his books and furniture to Thomas Ball, his favorite pupil and his minute biographer.
Preston’s early inclination for diplomacy was symptomatic of his character, which Fuller has summed as that of “a perfect politician,” apt “to flutter most on that place which was furthest from his eggs.” He had great self-command, kept his own counsel, and was impervious to outside criticism. Only to Ball does he seem to have frankly bared his mind, and Ball’s admiring delineation of him furnishes a singular picture of cautious astuteness and constitutional reserve. It is clear that his heart was firmly set on the propagation of the Calvinistic theology; his posthumous works (edited by Richard Sibbes, John Davenport, Thomas Ball, and partly by Thomas Goodwin, D.D.) are a storehouse of argument in its favor.
(Taken in part from the National Dictionary of biography, Oxford, 1896)
The Life of Preston, by Thomas Ball, written in 1628, several times printed in an abridged form by Samuel Clarke, the martyrologist (whose last edition is in his Lives of Thirty-two English Divines, 1677, pp. 75 sq.), is full and graphic; the chronological arrangement is sometimes confused (see also Clarke’s Life of John Cotton in the same collection, p. 219); it was edited in 1885 by E. W. Harcourt, esq., from the original manuscript at Nuneham. Fuller’s Church History, 1655, xi. 119, 126, 131; Fuller’s Worthies, 1662 (Northamptonshire), p. 291; Burnet’s History of his Own Time, 1724, i. 19; Granger’s Biographical Hist. of England, 1779, ii. 174, sq.; Middleton’s Biographia Evangelica, 1780, ii. 406 sq.; Brook’s Lives of the Puritans, 1813, ii. 356 sq.; Neal’s Hist. of the Puritans (Toulmin), 1822, ii. 124 sq.; Heywood and Wright’s Cambridge University Transactions, 1854, ii. 312 sq.; extracts from the University Register, Cambridge, per the master of Emmanuel, and from the burial register at Fawsley, per the Rev. P. W. Story.